Search results

Re: Australian Test XI - Selection Thread Johannesburg, 75.

Re: Mark Nicholas I cannot stand that bloke.

Re: Pakistan in Australia Yeah, I agree with this statement. 4 sessions is enough and by then we should be 440-450+.

Re: Australian Test XI - Selection Thread I'm not going to bother arguing that point, as it's completely irrelevant from my original debate.

Re: Australian ODI XI - Selection Thread I'm not arguing that point. He asked if we can fit all of these supposed next great all rounders in. I said if they're good enough be in on specialty alone, then they'll have no problem getting in. Not a completely different point to what you're...

Re: Australian Test XI - Selection Thread The team would've been in a shambles? Having an opening batsman failing every innings doesn't help the team. You're arguing a dead point. You know Hayden should have retired, you just don't want to admit it. Move on.

Re: Australian ODI XI - Selection Thread It's simple, if they're good enough to make the team on their specialty skill alone, then they'll get in.

Re: Australian Test XI - Selection Thread So you think a rebuilding team can afford to carry someone for 17 innings, 8 and a half matches? I don't think so.

Re: Australian ODI XI - Selection Thread Wouldn't be unhappy with White but would prefer others. :p

Re: Australian Test XI - Selection Thread Tell that to Brad Hodge.

Re: Australian Test XI - Selection Thread Big call there Boris. By the way, do you like earth or scrubbies?

Re: Guatam Gambhir and Irfan Pathan? Yeah he should maybe become a Mitchell Johnson style player. Bowler who can definitely handle the stick and be tagged a bowling AR.

Re: Australian Test XI - Selection Thread There is a difference between 11 innings and 17 innings. For the record, Langers last 17 innings yielded 482 runs at 32.13 (as compared to Hayden's 383 @ 23.94). Martyn's last 17 yielded 482 runs at 25.2. All of these players have one thing in...

Re: Australian Test XI - Selection Thread So you think scores of: 0, 13, 0, 29, 83, 16*, 16, 77, 8, 0, 24, 12, 4, 8, 23, 31, 39 are good enough? Obviously I'm taking it from the start of his bad run, but in 17 innings he had 9 scores between 0 and 20, 5 scores between 20 and 40, and 2 scores...

Re: Australian Test XI - Selection Thread No actually he played 11 matches in those 2 years.

Re: Australian Test XI - Selection Thread For 2 years he averaged under 33, not good enough, even for a great.

Re: Guatam Gambhir and Irfan Pathan? Pathan is only 25, so do people think it's possible he'll return? 100 wickets @ 32 and over 1000 runs at over 30.

Re: Australian Test XI - Selection Thread So because a commentator agrees with you, it makes you correct? No, it shows he shares your opinion. Since you've provided a case for why he shouldn't be moved from three, I'll provide a case for why he should be moved from three. We don't have that...

Re: Mark Nicholas Personally don't mind him to be honest. He adds something different. Tony Grieg, now that's a man I don't like.

Re: Virender's Blog Congrats V.