Krejza or Hauritz?
- Thread starter roxy09
- Start date
Re: Krejza or Hauritz?
Krejza for me.
Hauritz doesnt look like a wicket taker or a dangerous bowler. Watching him bowl, this might sound funny but he looks like one of those ' dead bowlers '
who doesnt have that zip in his bowling compared to others such as Vettori.
Krejza might be abit expensive but he surely is a wicket taker.
Krejza for me.
Hauritz doesnt look like a wicket taker or a dangerous bowler. Watching him bowl, this might sound funny but he looks like one of those ' dead bowlers '
who doesnt have that zip in his bowling compared to others such as Vettori.
Krejza might be abit expensive but he surely is a wicket taker.
postmanpav
Active Member
Re: Krejza or Hauritz?
As soon as Krejza learns to tighten up his bowling he is straight into the team for mine.
As soon as Krejza learns to tighten up his bowling he is straight into the team for mine.
siddle2franklin
New Member
Re: Krejza or Hauritz?
Hauritz more economical in the ODI's
Hauritz more economical in the ODI's
Mousey
New Member
Re: Krejza or Hauritz?
Hauritz because he is economical and, although he doesn't look as dangerous as Krezja, he DOES take wickets. Whether it be by annoying batsmen into playing big shots or with a rare good ball he has taken wickets consistantly. He doesn't have the ability to bowl out teams on Day 5, but on Days 1-4 he is a better option IMO.
Hauritz because he is economical and, although he doesn't look as dangerous as Krezja, he DOES take wickets. Whether it be by annoying batsmen into playing big shots or with a rare good ball he has taken wickets consistantly. He doesn't have the ability to bowl out teams on Day 5, but on Days 1-4 he is a better option IMO.
postmanpav
Active Member
Re: Krejza or Hauritz?
Agreed, But if Krejza learns to tighten it up he should get the gig.
Mousey;313064 said:
Agreed, But if Krejza learns to tighten it up he should get the gig.
swifty_147
Member
Re: Krejza or Hauritz?
Hauritz is defiantly a better choice for ODI's.
In a test match you have to take 10 wickets twice and even though he is more expensive I think Krejza is a better spinner for this form of the game.
roylandroos;313011 said:
Hauritz is defiantly a better choice for ODI's.
In a test match you have to take 10 wickets twice and even though he is more expensive I think Krejza is a better spinner for this form of the game.
el-capitano
Member
Re: Krejza or Hauritz?
We don't have a match winning spinner in our ranks at the moment, so if its a bland pitch, we need the spinner to just tie up an end, build pressure by not allowing many runs and that allow the quicks to get some wickets at the other end.
Its what Hauritz was brought in to do, and did his job in Sydney.
If Crazy can tighten it up- I'd rather have him though!
I'm sure that's the selectors comments to him to.postmanpav;311007 said:
We don't have a match winning spinner in our ranks at the moment, so if its a bland pitch, we need the spinner to just tie up an end, build pressure by not allowing many runs and that allow the quicks to get some wickets at the other end.
Its what Hauritz was brought in to do, and did his job in Sydney.
If Crazy can tighten it up- I'd rather have him though!
through the gate
New Member
Re: Krejza or Hauritz?
Special K hands down.
Krejza takes wickets; accuracy and and abilty to tie down an end will come with experience.
Hauritz is a hack. Before he was picked for Australia he could get a game for NSW.
Hauritz is a more reliable option in one dayers for the moment but once krejza get control he should be in th odi team as well
Special K hands down.
Krejza takes wickets; accuracy and and abilty to tie down an end will come with experience.
Hauritz is a hack. Before he was picked for Australia he could get a game for NSW.
Hauritz is a more reliable option in one dayers for the moment but once krejza get control he should be in th odi team as well