Dr. MAS
New Member
Who won? Darrell Hair or Inzamam Ul Haque
The heated debate on Darrell Hair's decision has ended. The drama was started when Darrell Hair charged Pakistani "TEAM" of being involved in ball tempering. Inzamam (a lazy player
) took late decision as usual and boycotted the match when he felt it is so shameful to carry forward with that match in which his whole team was declared a cheater and deceiver. 
The Pakistani team in protest of wrong judgment by the umpire did not appear again at ground after tea interval and after that Darrell Hair took right decision and declared England team “The Winner” according to the rules. On Thursday, after a two-day code-of-conduct hearing in London, it was ruled that the ball-tampering claim was not proven. The point from where the confliction was come up.
1. It was declared that no offense is made by Pakistani Team. Inzamam was also got free from the allegation of being involved in ball tempering.
2. Blair will not supervise champions’ trophy. (Four matches Banned)
3. Four matches banned were also applied on Inzi on the conduct of misbehavior and in the involvement of badly hurting the reputation of the game.
Here the question arises:-
Who won or lost in this confliction?
1. Inzamum Ul Haque who cannot play next four matches?????
2. Darrell Hair who also cannot officiate champion trophy matches (Loss of four matches fee) and also will not supervise matches to be played in India and Pakistan in future (many matches fees)??? He was called boo boo (Greedy Person) in the public when he demanded 500,00$ for his compulsory retirement and compensation in lieu of loss of match fees.
3. Pakistan Cricket Board who spent lot of money on lawyers and came up with mix judgment.
4. England team who has lost the taste of winning of all three test matches in the public even the team has won the series? And no body is questioning the progress of Pakistani team.
To my opinion,
In the entire story, the ground man actually won the game, who met with match officials and fed the wrong info into the mind and succeeded in his plan.
The heated debate on Darrell Hair's decision has ended. The drama was started when Darrell Hair charged Pakistani "TEAM" of being involved in ball tempering. Inzamam (a lazy player
) took late decision as usual and boycotted the match when he felt it is so shameful to carry forward with that match in which his whole team was declared a cheater and deceiver. The Pakistani team in protest of wrong judgment by the umpire did not appear again at ground after tea interval and after that Darrell Hair took right decision and declared England team “The Winner” according to the rules. On Thursday, after a two-day code-of-conduct hearing in London, it was ruled that the ball-tampering claim was not proven. The point from where the confliction was come up.
1. It was declared that no offense is made by Pakistani Team. Inzamam was also got free from the allegation of being involved in ball tempering.
2. Blair will not supervise champions’ trophy. (Four matches Banned)
3. Four matches banned were also applied on Inzi on the conduct of misbehavior and in the involvement of badly hurting the reputation of the game.
Here the question arises:-
Who won or lost in this confliction?
1. Inzamum Ul Haque who cannot play next four matches?????
2. Darrell Hair who also cannot officiate champion trophy matches (Loss of four matches fee) and also will not supervise matches to be played in India and Pakistan in future (many matches fees)??? He was called boo boo (Greedy Person) in the public when he demanded 500,00$ for his compulsory retirement and compensation in lieu of loss of match fees.
3. Pakistan Cricket Board who spent lot of money on lawyers and came up with mix judgment.
4. England team who has lost the taste of winning of all three test matches in the public even the team has won the series? And no body is questioning the progress of Pakistani team.
To my opinion,
In the entire story, the ground man actually won the game, who met with match officials and fed the wrong info into the mind and succeeded in his plan.
