futureblackcap
Well-Known Member
Hussey is off my list after defecting to the Sydney Thunder
Haha. Is that because you have a problem with pink or because you go for the other Sydney side?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hussey is off my list after defecting to the Sydney Thunder
Haha. Is that because you have a problem with pink or because you go for the other Sydney side?
A list of my greatest fielders
1. Jhonty Rhodes
2. Herschelle Gibbs
3. Ricky Ponting
4. Paul Collingwood
5. Andrew Symonds
6. Rabindra Jadeja
7. Tilakratne Dilshan
9. AB de Villiers
10. Yuvraj Singh
No Kiwis? The current side has a number of fielders who are up there with Symonds, Jadeja, Dilshan and Y Singh... Guptill, Williamson, the McCullum brothers etc.
Really, Rod Marsh and Jeffery Dujon at 7 & 8 they both make Sangakkara, Dhoni and Khan look like school boys and you put Stewart in there in front of names like David Murray, Ian Smith and Bob Taylor.Greatest wicket keepers
1. Mark Boucher
2. Adam Gilchrist
3. Ian Healy
4. Kumar Sangakkara
5. MS Dhoni
6. Moin Khan
7. Rod Marsh
8. Jeffrey Dujon
9. Romesh Kaluwitharana
10. Alec Stewart
Really, Rod Marsh and Jeffery Dujon at 7 & 8 they both make Sangakkara, Dhoni and Khan look like school boys and you put Stewart in there in front of names like David Murray, Ian Smith and Bob Taylor.
Not overly concerned about ODI statistics as they are very limited to the past 30 years and really the last 15 years where so much has been played for money on the sub-continent. This is about quality with the gloves and a bloke like Gilly was very good but Marsh was a wizard. There is match craft as well where players like Dujon excelled. Statistics can be deceiving, top players are standouts you don't need to check the numbers and with some players, like Stewart, he played in such a poor team someone had to get the wickets. This is the same for some others like Vettori, he was a great bowler but if he had more players around him he would not have taken the wickets he did because he had to.If you look at the test statistics you would be happy to put Rod Marsh and Jeff a bit higher, but cricket isnt only about tests no more... Look at ODI list and dhoni and kumar are way higher, probable maybe because they play more ODI games... i am excluding Moin Khan and Romesh Kaluwitharana and bringing in Brendon McCullum and Alan Knott though
Not overly concerned about ODI statistics as they are very limited to the past 30 years and really the last 15 years where so much has been played for money on the sub-continent. This is about quality with the gloves and a bloke like Gilly was very good but Marsh was a wizard. There is match craft as well where players like Dujon excelled. Statistics can be deceiving, top players are standouts you don't need to check the numbers and with some players, like Stewart, he played in such a poor team someone had to get the wickets. This is the same for some others like Vettori, he was a great bowler but if he had more players around him he would not have taken the wickets he did because he had to.
I'll defend Gilchrist here, his keeping stats are excellent and he consistently took some absolute blinders off the spinners and those other kind of bowlers that also play cricket. Sometimes I think in Oz Gilchrist's keeping gets underrated because Warne told everyone he's not Healy.Not overly concerned about ODI statistics as they are very limited to the past 30 years and really the last 15 years where so much has been played for money on the sub-continent. This is about quality with the gloves and a bloke like Gilly was very good but Marsh was a wizard. There is match craft as well where players like Dujon excelled. Statistics can be deceiving, top players are standouts you don't need to check the numbers and with some players, like Stewart, he played in such a poor team someone had to get the wickets. This is the same for some others like Vettori, he was a great bowler but if he had more players around him he would not have taken the wickets he did because he had to.
Healy was pretty average when he started, that's why Zoehrer and others were initially preferred to him, the only reason he became the number one choice was because Simpson liked his attitude. Likewise Healy's keeping and batting were in decline at the end of his career and he made some important mistakes in his time, who can forget that missed stumping of Inzamam off Warne that would've given Aus a series win in Pakistan?Gilly was pretty ordinary when he first started from memory but ended up being a very good keeper before sliding in his last 6 months or so.
And iirc so the WA legend goes Zoehrer having 'relations' with Simpson's daughter.. This is from before me following cricket but what some have told me replacing Tim at the time with Healy was pretty laughable he was that bad obviously being some personal issues with him.Healy was pretty average when he started, that's why Zoehrer and others were initially preferred to him, the only reason he became the number one choice was because Simpson liked his attitude.