Australia In New Zealand 16
- Thread starter futureblackcap
- Start date
The sheepshaggers? Nah, you lost to them (Wales) in the last Ashes 3-2.
nairbe
Active Member
That's a bit rough. It was clear in the replay that there was a small hotspot. Either the tech is in or out. The issue is more that this is not what the referral system was meant to be about. It was to remove the howler. That was no howler that was a tough but good decision. He had a doubt so the batsman got the benefit. That is the rule and has stood for a long time. The tech just blurred the line in a bad way.
futureblackcap
Well-Known Member
As nairbie says, it was the correct decision, Australia referred it, then weren't happy when it came back that they were still wrong...
Brian Lara
Active Member
Warner didn't like the stick he was getting from the NZ crowd. His wife is fair game for sledging.
5 European Cups
Active Member
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...th-but-where-s-the-star-quality-a6894071.html
Not sure what to make of this article - is this guy just stirring the pot?
Not sure what to make of this article - is this guy just stirring the pot?
nairbe
Active Member
stirring a bit but certainly not off the mark. A typical POMMY you would expect no less than the desperate need to remind us they hold the ashes. I don't fancy their chances of retaining it and the real test will come when we next tour the UK. Then when they are flogged Australia can claim superiority to the old enemy. The real trick is to perform in India.