Jonesy
Active Member
Re: The Specialist Tryer
Lol - specialist tryer. Hahaha.
I dunno, but I think there was more batting-allrounders and bowling-allrounders rather than pure allrounders. Because especially at the higher levels you bowling needs to be good enough to get wickets and your batting needs to be good enough to get 50s and get quite a bit of runs. If you average alright in both then you're really just filling in the numbers, just giving an option. You need to actually be able to have an influence on the game with both your batting and bowling to call yourself an allrounder, IMO. Like if you can win the game off your bat or with the ball.
Indoor has never really been something I've got into. Just doesn't seem my type of game. It's played in a pretty small space, yeah? Oh wait, you play a different version than I've played. I played the one where you bat in pairs and yeah, if you go out its like minus 5 runs. That version gives me the shits. You version seems better.
Lol - specialist tryer. Hahaha.
I dunno, but I think there was more batting-allrounders and bowling-allrounders rather than pure allrounders. Because especially at the higher levels you bowling needs to be good enough to get wickets and your batting needs to be good enough to get 50s and get quite a bit of runs. If you average alright in both then you're really just filling in the numbers, just giving an option. You need to actually be able to have an influence on the game with both your batting and bowling to call yourself an allrounder, IMO. Like if you can win the game off your bat or with the ball.
Indoor has never really been something I've got into. Just doesn't seem my type of game. It's played in a pretty small space, yeah? Oh wait, you play a different version than I've played. I played the one where you bat in pairs and yeah, if you go out its like minus 5 runs. That version gives me the shits. You version seems better.