Geelong Cricket Chat

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Geelong Cricket Chat

Babies Arm;283361 said:
hahaha, damn mods:D

been some good reading 2day. being told by an east belmont player that im not liked. ohno, stop me from jumping of the west gate.:rolleyes:

i'd fkn push ya, not stop ya ;)
 
Re: Geelong Cricket Chat

ToThePavilion;283364 said:
Must be East Belmont cricketers still sore over not making the GF last year.
Poor old East Belmont never happy are they. . . First XI still crying . . :confused:

yeh, and in that semi last year, one of the sissy allen girls claimed a catch toget hornet that clearly bounced and when we were bout to win, the new capt-coach had tears rolling down his cheek whilst running in2 bowl.:eek:
 
Re: Geelong Cricket Chat

oh, what did we do before we had Big Cricket to talk about alot of these chinese whispers. There is no truth in Brad getting any weeks if Ando gets any weeks as he was not out there and the captain cannot control batsmen. If anyone could control Ando it was me, so maybe I am in trouble !! Ando is a much loved player at South and he loves playing there. It is obvious that he sometimes goes over the top when playing but he is working hard on getting this out of his game. The East guys targeted him from ball one and in the heat of the moment he let his guard down. Anyway we have a game of cricket to win this Saturday and I am sure Brett will be working 110% to come away with a win. And as for Lions Den if he was a East Belmont 1st XI player his posts would be much more credible if he backed up any comments with his name. No use trying to make waves behind a name, which could be any John Doh around Geelong, so best not to take any notice of this guy at all
 
Re: Geelong Cricket Chat

lions den.;283279 said:
i have great contact there and i know certain people are fed up with his antics after all the good work they ve done over last few yrs to become a strong club

lions den.;283295 said:
i was there when it was said so its fact.. and i can say that this source has since told me that things are reaching "boling point" with him coz if he gets weeks so does brad, the source said they have built this family club..and he could be getting a tap at seasons end coz of the bad example set to young guys.damage is done. apparently they have some great juniors down there. all fact from my source tommy

lions den.;283341 said:
and hes only got himself to blame, the club is already fuming with him with all his warnings

gca_ipl;283398 said:
oh, what did we do before we had Big Cricket to talk about alot of these chinese whispers. There is no truth in Brad getting any weeks if Ando gets any weeks as he was not out there and the captain cannot control batsmen. If anyone could control Ando it was me, so maybe I am in trouble !! Ando is a much loved player at South and he loves playing there. It is obvious that he sometimes goes over the top when playing but he is working hard on getting this out of his game. The East guys targeted him from ball one and in the heat of the moment he let his guard down. Anyway we have a game of cricket to win this Saturday and I am sure Brett will be working 110% to come away with a win. And as for Lions Den if he was a East Belmont 1st XI player his posts would be much more credible if he backed up any comments with his name. No use trying to make waves behind a name, which could be any John Doh around Geelong, so best not to take any notice of this guy at all

Nice sourcing lions den.

IPL is President of this club you claim to have a "source" in. Think i will take his word over any trivial school-boy claims you make.

Keep your un-informed opinions out of this forum.

IPL summed it up best when he said this:
No use trying to make waves behind a name, which could be any John Doh around Geelong, so best not to take any notice of this guy at all

ZING!
 
Re: Geelong Cricket Chat

lions den.;283252 said:
well wen he came out to bat they hung ****** on him for loosing the grany last yr, how he dropped kelson. he then went off and the umpires tried to shut him up and then he called them cheats:D:D:D:D hes 1 stupid man

The saying is you can't teach new tricks to old dogs ah, his alway going to be like that doesn't matter what anyone says
 
Re: Geelong Cricket Chat

This is all i've got to say on the matter;
-Ando, like many cricketers around town sometimes lets the heat of the moment get the better of him. Everyone has been guilty of that over the years, however in Brett's defence, despite the fact that he could be called a serial offender, he is obviously working on this aspect of his game. Too bad others around the place aren't. More importantly, i have known Brett off the field for a couple of years and he is a great bloke to have a beer with. I knew all the stuff about his behaviour before i met him and since i have made his acquaintence, i have found the man to be fantastic and it is a shame that others, as said, aren't similar and unfortunately are tossers off the field as well as on.
-Not sure how the Brad clause works but a captain can certainly be suspended for not controlling his players adequately. I'm not sure how many people would remember it but about 10 years or so ago, North Shore played Geelong West in a Div 2 Grand Final. It all started when G Talarico would not depart when dismissed by a catch in slips that he thought hadn't carried; umpires conversed, agreed that they couldn't give it out and the situation got worse from there. David Roach stormed the umpires' rooms at tea, pointing fingers and threatening them, the famous Scoble/Hirst collision later (a la Gillespie/Waugh) again flared things up again and at the end of the matter, Roach was out for a season or more, Poulter as well and Ty Watts for failing to control his players copped a ban. So, that's how the captaincy thing comes into it. Not saying that it applies here, just demonstrating how it happens. Anyway, that's enough from me.
 
Re: Geelong Cricket Chat

Surely a bit of verbal abuse shouldn't constitute a ban - especially if the fielders started it?! The stuff that is said at international level must be loads worse and nobody ever gets banned.

Let the big Bird keep steaming in - fair play to teams winding him up as they know it's not too difficult, but don't punish him for reacting!
 
Re: Geelong Cricket Chat

thommy_rissole;283342 said:
Could we possibly keep the personal slander down a little bit.

I understand Ando's in the limelight here because he has been reported but i think it's getting a bit out of hand.

Yes everyone knows that he is a fast bowler who has a temper issue but there is no need to hide behind a forum name and kick the bloke in the guts.

I know he abuses people on here but at least he does it when everyone know's who he is and doesn't hide that fact, whilst i still don't think it's a good idea and in now way support it, those people who he abuses at least know who he is.

As for Brad getting reported also, if that's true it's ridiculous: there is no way he can be in control of the batsmen when he is watching, i hope this is just heresay and not fact.

when did you become a moderator admin, stop telling others what to do.
 
Re: Geelong Cricket Chat

Bluey Connelly;283474 said:
Surely a bit of verbal abuse shouldn't constitute a ban - especially if the fielders started it?! The stuff that is said at international level must be loads worse and nobody ever gets banned.

Let the big Bird keep steaming in - fair play to teams winding him up as they know it's not too difficult, but don't punish him for reacting!

yes let him steam in!!!
 
Re: Geelong Cricket Chat

dazza_whats_the_score;283501 said:
its not going to be easy obviously, but im sure the boys will give it a fair crack and hopefully chase down those runs!!

it should be a road at thomson this week shouldn't it?
 
Re: Geelong Cricket Chat

pencil in 11;283396 said:
i think i know who the lions den could be ando, its either coggsy or that van hees bloke that follows eeeee-belmont

lol, no way its coggsy, do you think he could run a computer or even be bother to try. i love coggsy but it aint him, no effing way.:D:D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top