Hanz lowman
Member
I aggree to a certain degree in what you are saying that the ECA is a good move (grounds, investing in synthetic comp) I can't aggree with the rest of your points becuase i think they are contradicting. If you are part of the ECC exec im sure you would have read the documentation regarding the whole NECA proposal.DJ Yallah, Hanz Lowman, Jika One Edinburgh has a number of reasons for not joining the new NECA (which won't go ahead as Banyule are tipped to follow ECC and EISCC to Eastern). These have been spelled out to the HDCA executive for the past 6 months. Anyone who was at the last meeting of HDCA clubs would be well aware that Edinburgh would not be apart of NECA, it was made very very clear.
The reasons for choosing ECA over NECA are as follows and in no particular order:
the standard of facilities/grounds is far superior in ECA
the amount and standard of umpires is signifigantly higher in ECA
the level of behaviour is signifigantly higher in ECA
ECA have a firm 'no dickheads' policy. Simply put if you mess up you are out.
ECA have 6 senior 2 day grades and many one day grades on Synthetic as well as Turf grades allowing for continued growth of ECC which wouldn't fit in NECA
In meetings between ECA and ECC it has been made very clear that ECA want to get away from the perception they are a turf competition. They are investing heavily in their synthetic grades at the current time
Yarra Council has opened discussions with Edinburgh re possibly taking over a turf ground that is currently unused
ECA have expressed a very strong desire to support Edinburgh's women's team
Edinburgh feel putting two failing competitions together does not make a good competition. NECA is simply a stop gap hoping to last until an overall NCL is formed.
I sit on Edinburgh's exec and the above reasons are why it is our firm belief that Eastern Cricket Association is a better fit for us. I'm sure plenty of you will be happy to say our reasons are all rubbish but we're pretty comfortable with our position.
The proposal clearly stated that umpiring, clubs's ethical standards and the amount of teams per grade are paramount in the NECA's interest.
The whole idea of the merger was to merge to failing comps together, identify each respective comps weaknesses and strengths and try to create a new leauge in which these weaknesses become strengths.
I can't argue the grounds quality, and i am no having a dig at Eastern, but all your above reasons are what the NECA was set out to create and if ECC and co. where open to discussions on how to create this leauge we all wouldn't be in this situation.