Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
mas cambios;396502 said:Far worse is trying to catch Australian style and letting the ball through your hands and smack you on the forehead.
Boris;396531 said:I remember when our keeper was sick one time and had 4 weeks off I tried out putting the gloves on then, thinking that if I was an alright slips fielder then I'd be great with the gloves!
Pretty much it was byes interrupted by the occasional fumble. I'm a bit better these days, but still not the best.
I took one right down to the left, right on the ground, with the ball jamming straight down on my pinky and driving it into the ground. Broke my finger, but didn't notice at the time, just ached a little.
At the end of the innings I took that glove off and found I could barely get it off my hand such was the swelling. Hurt quite a bit once I saw that
Still carried on the next 3 weeks as keeper regardless, as is the keeper style. Really hate keeping now.
SteveyD;396533 said:I#ve never kept in a match, only in a load of practises. I thought the general rule was quite simple, rise with the ball, and get in the way of it. Perhaps because i play soccer as a goalie i'm used to that lol.
ps this isn't taking the piss out of wicket keepers, it is stupidly hard! Just my view of it is that i dont care if i get hit around a bit as long as i dont let the ball past!
Could be!Boris;396536 said:Is this mostly a what injuries you have had while fielding thread?
mas cambios;396502 said:Far worse is trying to catch Australian style and letting the ball through your hands and smack you on the forehead.
Ljp86;396660 said:Australian style is easily the best way to catch the ball. Also the best way to catch the ball that goes high in the air and you're underneath waiting for it.
Boris;396710 said:Can you explain the differences of the two?
I have a fair idea; the fingers up and down are the differences aren't they?
mas cambios;396670 said:I'm always in two minds about it. I only really use the aussie style when the sun is getting in the way (which is one of the reasons it was developed) but then again, I probably don't think too much about it.
Tumo;396741 said:ljp86, there is no conclusive proof for that. normal style comes more naturally. also, aussie style takes a lot of practice. it depends on the catcher. i class myself as a very good catcher of the ball, and i never catch it fingers facing upwards, because it doesn't suit me. the few times i've done it, i've dropped it. simple as. there is nothing to say that either is better than the other, apart from personal experience.
I think its more like, chest level, because you can't really catch balls on your shoulder / pecs/chest that easy with fingers downLjp86;396790 said:It's a much safer option. Catching the ball with fingers facing upwards enables the player to have a second opportunity to catch the ball if the ball spills out from the first attempt. The player can easily move his hands down to catch the ball a second time if the first isn't successful. It's likely the ball will get caught up in the player's arms too which can make the second attempt easier.
Any ball that is in the air above my eye level I will catch using the fingers upward method. It's the safest method and the best method to use in my opinion when catching a ball that is above the player. It's also the technique I was tought at a young age, all cricketers here are taught that way. Any other balls that are below my eye level I will catch normal style as the fingers upward method isn't practical.
SteveyD;396803 said:I think its more like, chest level, because you can't really catch balls on your shoulder / pecs/chest that easy with fingers down
someblokecalleddave;398022 said:How not to - Crocodile style, my kids still do it and I reckon I still might do it ocassionally - Doh!