mas cambios
Active Member
Jason Krejza -An honest appraisal
I thought I'd start this to get some of your views on whether or not Krejza is the real deal.
Now, I'm not an Aussie and although I look at the scorecards for the 1st class games now and then, I'll be honest and say that I'm not overly familiar with Australian cricket, outside of the test team/fringes, so I'm looking for your input on this one.
To me Krejza has seemingly come out of nowhere to make his test début. The guy has only played 25 first class games, and when combined with an average of 45+, those stats hardly scream 'test player'. He also goes for a shade under 4 an over, which again isn't the best, but passable for a spinner.
Moving on to his test début and by all accounts he bowled well, isn't afraid to flight the ball and attack. He also seems to have a good temperament and wasn't overly deflated when the Indian batsman attacked him. Taking 8 wickets in an innings is great and 12 overall is a really good start.
On the other hand, wickets aside he was expensive, leaking 358 runs at a touch under 5 per over. Some would argue that when you bear in mind the runs he gave away, it doesn't really matter how many wickets he took as the other team will still score big. What happens when he's leaking runs but not taking wickets?
With all of the above in mind, is he the future of Aussie spin bowling or a temporary measure? Your thoughts please.
I thought I'd start this to get some of your views on whether or not Krejza is the real deal.
Now, I'm not an Aussie and although I look at the scorecards for the 1st class games now and then, I'll be honest and say that I'm not overly familiar with Australian cricket, outside of the test team/fringes, so I'm looking for your input on this one.
To me Krejza has seemingly come out of nowhere to make his test début. The guy has only played 25 first class games, and when combined with an average of 45+, those stats hardly scream 'test player'. He also goes for a shade under 4 an over, which again isn't the best, but passable for a spinner.
Moving on to his test début and by all accounts he bowled well, isn't afraid to flight the ball and attack. He also seems to have a good temperament and wasn't overly deflated when the Indian batsman attacked him. Taking 8 wickets in an innings is great and 12 overall is a really good start.
On the other hand, wickets aside he was expensive, leaking 358 runs at a touch under 5 per over. Some would argue that when you bear in mind the runs he gave away, it doesn't really matter how many wickets he took as the other team will still score big. What happens when he's leaking runs but not taking wickets?
With all of the above in mind, is he the future of Aussie spin bowling or a temporary measure? Your thoughts please.