brickwaller99
Member
Re: Last person to post on this thread wins 7
It's not garbage. It's a semi-understandable jargon-based interface.
Surely if the work enables us to understand the biography then doesn't the biography then explicate the word, and so on ad infinitum meaning that the biographical subject can never truly elucidate the work because the biography is explicated by the work and the work illuminates the biography.
Therefore there can never be a work but merely the thought of the work in both reader-centered and author-centered viewpoints?
This is not philosophy. It's garbage apparently.
It's not garbage. It's a semi-understandable jargon-based interface.
Boris;391951 said:It is not the biography that explicates the work, but the work that sometimes enables one to understand the biography.
We getting into a philosophical war?
Surely if the work enables us to understand the biography then doesn't the biography then explicate the word, and so on ad infinitum meaning that the biographical subject can never truly elucidate the work because the biography is explicated by the work and the work illuminates the biography.
Therefore there can never be a work but merely the thought of the work in both reader-centered and author-centered viewpoints?
This is not philosophy. It's garbage apparently.