Apologies if this has been done to death (but I'm just thick and the searches aren't giving me the information I think I'm looking for). I'm happy my basic technique is progressing so I'd like to start tackling accuracy (if nothing else this would make me a useful nets bowler - I'm rather hot and cold at present).
My most accurate balls are normally rather lofty which whilst the occasional one might get a wicket (I play at a low level so often the bad balls are the ones that take wickets but I want to be better than 5 bad balls an over). The flatter balls are often wide. I suspect this is one and the same problem with release point but I like to gamify my training sessions (10 balls - 1 point for a good delivery, 1/2 point for partially good - best score of the day wins)
1. In which order should I rank my accuracy in? Height - length - width
2. In which proportions should I have an acceptable standard. E.g. is 2foot short of a length worse than 1 foot wide?
3. Which attributes are worth working on order. E.g. work first on height - flat deliveries - and the rest will come to you?
Ta.
My most accurate balls are normally rather lofty which whilst the occasional one might get a wicket (I play at a low level so often the bad balls are the ones that take wickets but I want to be better than 5 bad balls an over). The flatter balls are often wide. I suspect this is one and the same problem with release point but I like to gamify my training sessions (10 balls - 1 point for a good delivery, 1/2 point for partially good - best score of the day wins)
1. In which order should I rank my accuracy in? Height - length - width
2. In which proportions should I have an acceptable standard. E.g. is 2foot short of a length worse than 1 foot wide?
3. Which attributes are worth working on order. E.g. work first on height - flat deliveries - and the rest will come to you?
Ta.