Mike or David Hussey ?

Re: Mike or David Hussey ?

With our spin options being horrible I have David over Mike.

Both should be in the team.
 
Re: Mike or David Hussey ?

Mike because he has been their and done that. Dave hasn't.

I don't think you can really compare at this point of time TBH.
 
Re: Mike or David Hussey ?

roxy09;313892 said:
Both great batters, both handy bowlers.
But who's better and why ? :cool:
I wouldn't call Mike an overly handy bowler, okay at times but David clearly is a more handy option as an offie (almost, if not to the point where you could label him a batting all-rounder) than Mike is with his mediums.
But Michael can keep wickets, which he has done a couple of times for Australia before.;)
I would still rate Mike at this stage more, going through a form slump but hey, look at the expectation after his monumental start to his career.
David is just about ready to be a regular in the shorter forms but when, not if, he gets in the test side is another thing.
 
Re: Mike or David Hussey ?

David hasn't even played a Test and is yet to prove himself at ODI level. Mike by a mile even out of form.
 
Re: Mike or David Hussey ?

Stupid thread, Michael has already proven himself to me and is good in my books but he needs to step up too because he has had a shit summer, it's just his first bleep in his career as for David, he is a very usefull bowler but also needs to step up on the batting and have nice knocks. He could be very usefull in the Test.
 
Back
Top