New Zealands tour of England
- Thread starter D.K
- Start date
Re: New Zealands tour of England
Bell runs out Southee!!! Southee dabs into covers but Bell was quick and threw down the stumps with Southee just short. That's the fifth run out of the game.
9/234 and in walks Mark Gillespie as number eleven. 12 required from 20.
Bell runs out Southee!!! Southee dabs into covers but Bell was quick and threw down the stumps with Southee just short. That's the fifth run out of the game.
9/234 and in walks Mark Gillespie as number eleven. 12 required from 20.
Re: New Zealands tour of England
Mills hits Collingwood for six...and they've lost the ball!!! That was huge, a massive swipe from Mills over midwicket, a typical tailender slog! That shot went 106 metres apparently.
9/240, six needed from nine. One strike could do it...
Mills hits Collingwood for six...and they've lost the ball!!! That was huge, a massive swipe from Mills over midwicket, a typical tailender slog! That shot went 106 metres apparently.
9/240, six needed from nine. One strike could do it...
Re: New Zealands tour of England
What a finish!!!!!! New Zealand win on the final ball!!!! Gillespie finally connected and they got the single but not before an attempted shy at the stumps. But, there was no-one backing up!!! The NZ players were screaming on the balcony and Mills and Gillespie manage to scamper through for the second!!!
NZ win by one wicket with no balls remaining!! What a game!!!! @|
What a finish!!!!!! New Zealand win on the final ball!!!! Gillespie finally connected and they got the single but not before an attempted shy at the stumps. But, there was no-one backing up!!! The NZ players were screaming on the balcony and Mills and Gillespie manage to scamper through for the second!!!
NZ win by one wicket with no balls remaining!! What a game!!!! @|
B
Bluto11
Guest
Re: New Zealands tour of England
apparently a nice easy throw to one of the three england players around the stumps would've seen NZ run out and therefore losing.
apparently a nice easy throw to one of the three england players around the stumps would've seen NZ run out and therefore losing.
D.K
Active Member
Re: New Zealands tour of England
Elliot was run out after colliding with Sidebottom, but Collingwood refused to withdraw the appeal
This is something that is against the game's spirit of conduct, Elliot was unable to complete the run because of Sidebottom. Should of been called back, would happen in any club game I know of. Thats how desperate the English were to have a win
Elliot was run out after colliding with Sidebottom, but Collingwood refused to withdraw the appeal
This is something that is against the game's spirit of conduct, Elliot was unable to complete the run because of Sidebottom. Should of been called back, would happen in any club game I know of. Thats how desperate the English were to have a win
Kram81
Well-Known Member
Re: New Zealands tour of England
The runout..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLDbfAFZSuQ
And the last over.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7bR4zgrIm0
The runout..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLDbfAFZSuQ
And the last over.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7bR4zgrIm0
Re: New Zealands tour of England
Good work Kram. @|
That's the first I've seen of the incident, all I can say is that Collingwood should hang his head in shame. That was a legitimate collision, Elliott did everything in his power to try and avoid it but couldn't get out of the way.
Poor, poor form from Collingwood, should have been called back. It was probably justice that New Zealand won on the last ball.
What a last over though, doesn't get much better than that. Amateur stuff from England, one of the most basic skills taught in cricket is to have a player backing up the throw, cricketers are taught that when the first start playing the game. Broad was about 15 metres too close and I'm not too sure what the other three were doing.
Who said 50 over cricket was dead?
Kram81;222139 said:
Good work Kram. @|
That's the first I've seen of the incident, all I can say is that Collingwood should hang his head in shame. That was a legitimate collision, Elliott did everything in his power to try and avoid it but couldn't get out of the way.
Poor, poor form from Collingwood, should have been called back. It was probably justice that New Zealand won on the last ball.
What a last over though, doesn't get much better than that. Amateur stuff from England, one of the most basic skills taught in cricket is to have a player backing up the throw, cricketers are taught that when the first start playing the game. Broad was about 15 metres too close and I'm not too sure what the other three were doing.
Who said 50 over cricket was dead?
el-capitano
Member
Re: New Zealands tour of England
What I find funny is the Kiwis crying foul.
Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black?
This is the same Kiwi side that runs out Murali, when he's not attempting a run, but just going to congratulate a teammate who got a century.........
Its not the first time they've done this- they did it to some no. 10 batsman in Zimbabwe too iirc.
What I find funny is the Kiwis crying foul.
Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black?
This is the same Kiwi side that runs out Murali, when he's not attempting a run, but just going to congratulate a teammate who got a century.........
Its not the first time they've done this- they did it to some no. 10 batsman in Zimbabwe too iirc.
E
eddiesmith
Guest
Re: New Zealands tour of England
Elliott ran between the ball and bowler, it was an accidental collision and the rules say bad luck, he wasnt injured and besides he would have been run out comfortably if he didnt get in Sidebottoms way, he could have run down the other side of the pitch but like all batsman tries to get in the fielders way and paid for it
But I guess its not in the spirit of the game, definately not like the occassion when a ball goes through to the keeper, the non striker wanders out of his crease checking out the pitch and the keeper runs him out...Now that was in the spirit of the game
Elliott ran between the ball and bowler, it was an accidental collision and the rules say bad luck, he wasnt injured and besides he would have been run out comfortably if he didnt get in Sidebottoms way, he could have run down the other side of the pitch but like all batsman tries to get in the fielders way and paid for it
But I guess its not in the spirit of the game, definately not like the occassion when a ball goes through to the keeper, the non striker wanders out of his crease checking out the pitch and the keeper runs him out...Now that was in the spirit of the game
Re: New Zealands tour of England
Paul Collingwood has been suspended for four ODI's by the ICC after being found guilty of a Level 3 ICC Code of Conduct breach. The breach relates to the 4th ODI between England and New Zealand after England failed to bowl 50 overs within the allotted timeframe.
The ban will see Collingwood miss the final one-day game against New Zealand as well as an ODI against Scotland, a Twenty20 game against South Africa and then the first one-day match against the Proteas a week later. Kevin Pietersen will take over the reigns until Collingwood returns.
Under ICC rules, a team that falls more than two overs behind the required over rate incurs a level two breach. Any player found guilty of this within 12 months of their previous offence will have the charge upgraded to a level three breach. Collingwood fell three overs behind against India in August last year hence the charge was upgraded.
Slow over rate costs Collingwood
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough I suppose. The players know the rules and England fell foul of them again so the ICC didn't have much choice. The ECB will at least get to see what Pietersen has to offer as a leader.
Paul Collingwood has been suspended for four ODI's by the ICC after being found guilty of a Level 3 ICC Code of Conduct breach. The breach relates to the 4th ODI between England and New Zealand after England failed to bowl 50 overs within the allotted timeframe.
The ban will see Collingwood miss the final one-day game against New Zealand as well as an ODI against Scotland, a Twenty20 game against South Africa and then the first one-day match against the Proteas a week later. Kevin Pietersen will take over the reigns until Collingwood returns.
Under ICC rules, a team that falls more than two overs behind the required over rate incurs a level two breach. Any player found guilty of this within 12 months of their previous offence will have the charge upgraded to a level three breach. Collingwood fell three overs behind against India in August last year hence the charge was upgraded.
Slow over rate costs Collingwood
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough I suppose. The players know the rules and England fell foul of them again so the ICC didn't have much choice. The ECB will at least get to see what Pietersen has to offer as a leader.