Blake Lively
New Member
Re: North A & B
thanks for the beer yest 7/564 went down a treat
thanks for the beer yest 7/564 went down a treat
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Blake Lively;339426 said:thanks for the beer yest 7/564 went down a treat
Blake Lively;339428 said:went down for a look at the NB1 GF. Looks like WC might have shot them selves in the foot by batting for time instead of looking for runs. Will be very interesting finish to game today
7/564;339753 said:Any time mate.
Now make sure you tell my cuz how good the beer is at EK for next year
Guru14;339761 said:4get about batting time- Why as the captain would you win the toss on what looked like a road, 33 degrees on the first playing day of a grand final would you bowl!!! Surely if you need a result becaue you are the lower finishing side would you not bat and take control of the game. The word coming out of the MV huddle was that 10 of 11 wanted to bowl first, apparently they felt they chase better, maybe they should have listened to the one smart bloke in their lineup. having said that they hard every chance to win after restricting WC to just over 200. Edrich the difference I think, hoping Centrals hold onto him for next year.
What in the blazers;340277 said:At the end of the day we needed 10 wickets to win the game, we gave ourselves the best chance we could to get those 10 wickets. They ended up batting 90 odd overs. Like you said we had the game there to win if we had taken the chance, so choosing to bowl didnt cost us the granny, failing to make 205 runs in 60 odd overs cost us.
Guru14;340283 said:Yeah you did, but I think with runs on the board those 10 wickets are easier to get- just ask Werribee. score board pressure is a wonderful thing and the word grand final just adds to that pressure. I just think by batting you take control of the game and send a message to the opposition, they gave you every chance by forgetting to score but once again the pressure of the occassion and 'runs' on the board was the difference. You can't blame the captain but hopefully the boys in the side will take a lot out of the game and will always be positive in their thinking. The 10 of 11 vote would have been a vote with plenty of nerves attached to it which is understandable. I hope you well in North A but the positive vibe needs to be there with every decision you make- never give a sucker an even break and i think you guys gave centrals an even break!
What in the blazers;340277 said:At the end of the day we needed 10 wickets to win the game, we gave ourselves the best chance we could to get those 10 wickets. They ended up batting 90 odd overs. Like you said we had the game there to win if we had taken the chance, so choosing to bowl didnt cost us the granny, failing to make 205 runs in 60 odd overs cost us.
Guru14;340283 said:Yeah you did, but I think with runs on the board those 10 wickets are easier to get- just ask Werribee. score board pressure is a wonderful thing and the word grand final just adds to that pressure. I just think by batting you take control of the game and send a message to the opposition, they gave you every chance by forgetting to score but once again the pressure of the occassion and 'runs' on the board was the difference. You can't blame the captain but hopefully the boys in the side will take a lot out of the game and will always be positive in their thinking. The 10 of 11 vote would have been a vote with plenty of nerves attached to it which is understandable. I hope you well in North A but the positive vibe needs to be there with every decision you make- never give a sucker an even break and i think you guys gave centrals an even break!
What in the blazers;340302 said:I agree 100% scoreboard pressure counts and runs on the board and all that, but our understanding was that means nothing if they didnt have to make the runs. They could have been 5 for 50 after 90 overs and still won, a draw was all they needed, we were in ordinary condidtions. There was no scoreboard pressure.
7/564;339753 said:Any time mate.
Now make sure you tell my cuz how good the beer is at EK for next year
Guru14;340314 said:7 fa what's the club doing next year, are you guys looking for someone to do the captain/coach gig or has the club got someone already in mind to take the helm
Guru14;340312 said:What in the....... I guess the loss still hurts so we can agree to disagree but there are very few clubs if any in B1 who can or could bat for 90 overs let alone survive. I watched a fair portion of the game and it appeared that MV was overawed by the occassion and that showed in their run chase. My understanding is 85 overs per day or even if we say 80, your boys had 24 overs up their sleeve. My point is MV bat first bat 80 overs as they would in a normal home & away fixture and score at a minimum of 3 an over= 240. That's plenty of pressure on the opposition 80 overs work of pressure. same difference whether you take 10 wickets batting or bowling first you have to give yourself every advantage. 240 on the board would have been an advantage because guys still pay attention to it, relevant or not. From where I was watching, it was as if MV were waiting for something to happen rather than making it happen. Fielding was down, no pressure on the batsmen with field placings etc. If your going to bowl first to win the game runs obviously are irrelevant in terms of the 10 wickets, i felt the 10 wickets took a back seat vs the runs trying to be saved. Regardless the wicket would have been great on the first day and the weather conditions meant you had to have a crack.
What in the blazers;340348 said:Dont really disagree with anything you have said re the way we played, after tea on the first day we were a different team, two quick wickets and it went from 1 for 113 to 3 forr 113 all out 205. Bowing lines were a lot different and pressure was up, wouldnt say our fielding was down. We missed a stumping or two and the keeper dropped a one or two when he was up at the stumps. Any other day you would of batted first, when you have only 2 blokes make over 10 runs you are never going to win a granny let along just an ordinary game.
We got touched up, we got done, but we gave it a shake and there were more than a few times during the game that we had them chewing their nails, we just failed to capitalise on them.
7/564;340352 said:I agree your bowling was great after tea on the first day,
a couple off bad shots early in your innings didnt help, but you were a big chance with 6 wickets down and only about 60 runs to get when a bad LBW went against you.
But you should be proud of years effort's and the way your team conduted themselfs on the grand final days.
Alot better then the a few people did from the winning team.
All the best in North A next year
What in the blazers;340348 said:Dont really disagree with anything you have said re the way we played, after tea on the first day we were a different team, two quick wickets and it went from 1 for 113 to 3 forr 113 all out 205. Bowing lines were a lot different and pressure was up, wouldnt say our fielding was down. We missed a stumping or two and the keeper dropped a one or two when he was up at the stumps. Any other day you would of batted first, when you have only 2 blokes make over 10 runs you are never going to win a granny let along just an ordinary game.
We got touched up, we got done, but we gave it a shake and there were more than a few times during the game that we had them chewing their nails, we just failed to capitalise on them.
Snagglepuss;338071 said:I'll give it a quick shot but its a tough ask:
A1 B1
Preece Aiyappin
Innes Mulheron
Kosteas Robinson
Courts (wk) Perera
Jeffrey Wickramasinghe
Windridge Carlisle
Walker Albers
Zaharodni Collishaw
Pizaro Whelan (wk)
Kamburugamawuru Pascu
Blanchett Edrich
12th Thompson 12th Siriwardene
7/564;340352 said:I agree your bowling was great after tea on the first day,
a couple off bad shots early in your innings didnt help, but you were a big chance with 6 wickets down and only about 60 runs to get when a bad LBW went against you.
But you should be proud of years effort's and the way your team conduted themselfs on the grand final days.
Alot better then the a few people did from the winning team.
All the best in North A next year