bomber27
Member
Re: North West Cricket Association
Sounds like some sour grapes there Oldman. The only reason the NWCA have the stronger clubs is that we have our lower grades in the NWCA and our top teams are in the VTCA. Its fine by me but the NWCA is basically a place for the VTCA clubs to put there lower grades and juniors.
How many first eleven sides actually play in the NWCA compared to the MMVCA. I think you'll find they have double the amount.
I really couldn't care whether the merger went ahead or not but from what I've heard from my club is that it was the NWCA who needed the merger more than the MMVCA.
Thats my 2 cents.
oldman65;345966 said:As you all would be aware my club is a NWCA club and what i would like to know is what we would have got out of mergering with the MMVCA?
yeah i know that it would have made us a bigger/better comp but the truth of the matter is the NWCA is the stronger comp so why were we all wanting for this merger to go ahead.
the NWCA have the better cricketers !
the NWCA have the stronger clubs !
the NWCA is a financially strong comp!
next time they want to merge we (the clubs from the NWCA)can all vote against it and let them sink !
Most of their good players are jumping ship anyway and coming across to the NWCA so they might not even have a comp soon.
We should just take them over and start them all off in GLissold shield and they can work their way up from their!!!!!!!!
Sounds like some sour grapes there Oldman. The only reason the NWCA have the stronger clubs is that we have our lower grades in the NWCA and our top teams are in the VTCA. Its fine by me but the NWCA is basically a place for the VTCA clubs to put there lower grades and juniors.
How many first eleven sides actually play in the NWCA compared to the MMVCA. I think you'll find they have double the amount.
I really couldn't care whether the merger went ahead or not but from what I've heard from my club is that it was the NWCA who needed the merger more than the MMVCA.
Thats my 2 cents.