Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gladyboy;211791 said:Just bumped into a guys who sleeps with Paul Thomas He said he is fully fit
MB24;211808 said:hahahahahah
ahhahahahaha
hahahahahahha
nobody, someone got dropped before the last round.Wiseman;211769 said:Surely he wont play if he is injured would be very risky ton the Lakers behalf to carry injuries into a final?
Who misses out at Gladdy?
intrigued24;211864 said:didnt he captain the stringer flag side last year?
gullyrat1;211865 said:18 wickets at 25, I am sure that Taylors will be marking him down as one to see off!!!! Not
See the lakes have a bloke who has taken 16 wickets at 7 in the last 3 games, I wounder how gladdy will go against him? 14 wickets at 6 in the last 2 games on the lakes pitch!!!!
intrigued24;211867 said:wasnt harrison a thirds player all year last year?
intrigued24;211867 said:wasnt harrison a thirds player all year last year?
Gladyboy;211868 said:Harrsion got taken apart last year in Barron by Robbo and Coops the only way he gets wickets is by blokes miss timing balls he is no good bowls medium paced inswinging pies
gullyrat1;211869 said:well lets compair bowling attacks
Harrison 17w @ 8
Thomas 35w @ 13
Just 10w @ 22
Haigh 15w @ 17
Lee 10w @ 26
McMullin 8 @ 18
Lakes also can bowl
Cutajar
Markham if playing
Singh
Gladdy
Keats 23w @ 20
Fackler 20w @ 21
More 18w @ 25
Viani 15w @ 26
Shep 14 @ 24
Lambeth Has not played 1st's
Who has the stronger attack?
Gladyboy;211871 said:You really have no life rat boy
i will only mention guys averaging over 40 as the rest is irrelvant
Markham 605 @ 50
Shep 466 2 58
cammers 376 2 41
Derv 300 @ 43
Taylors
Lee 496 @50
That is all
Gladyboy;211871 said:You really have no life rat boy
i will only mention guys averaging over 40 as the rest is irrelvant
Markham 605 @ 50
Shep 466 2 58
cammers 376 2 41
Derv 300 @ 43
Taylors
Lee 496 @50
That is all
intrigued24;211882 said:im not trying to start an argument here gullyrat but why are you so pro-talylors?
or are you just anti-gladdy?
@|
intrigued24;211882 said:im not trying to start an argument here gullyrat but why are you so pro-talylors?
or are you just anti-gladdy?
@|