Re: Question about batting technique from a TV programme
Yeah, I see where you are coming from, good decision making. You're a bowler too IIRC so I guess it's not as if batting is the be all and end all of playing cricket.
Jim2109;399535 said:on paper its the best option, i just have concerns about long term side effects. the procedure just hasnt existed long enough for there to be any certainty about what happens say 30 years down the road. when im about 35-40 there will be more data on it and then il know how safe it is. i just dont want to be 45 and blind lol. the short term gains arent worth the risk IMO, you only get one pair of eyes, and mine work plenty well enough at present, its not like i can hardly see, my slight lack of long range vision is just a minor inconvenience really.
Yeah, I see where you are coming from, good decision making. You're a bowler too IIRC so I guess it's not as if batting is the be all and end all of playing cricket.