They're trying to restructure Metro cricket, but clearly they want everybody one board. And in previous posts we spoke about what cards can CV play and we mentioned taking away VSDCA grants, not awarding strategic grants etc - surely forcing a bye would be a card they would play, if they can.I do not know if CV has a right of veto or not. But, if they do, then they would need to have a very compelling case for exercising it. In the example we are talking about there wouldn't appear to be any such compelling reason. Are they really trying to shut down the VSDCA? or trying to restructure Metro cricket? If anyone captured by the restructure decides to reject CV then I am pretty sure that entity has pretty control over it's own destiny. If they didn't, CV would have mandated the change after consultation but they clearly don't have the power to do so.
And although I don't know if they need a compelling reason, they may think this is a good enough one