Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Smith's conversion rate is very impressive Craig - Williamson isn't too far behind him with 32 50's & 24 100's, what's so amazing about Williamson's stats is we normally only play a one test or two test series & hardly ever play a 3 test series... the big 3 have a big advantage of playing a 4 or 5 test series allowing batsmen to get a much better flow going with their batting.How is Smith's conversion rate Pete. .. 30 fifties 27 maximums. Wonder if Williamson and Kohli can match that. Pretty sure Smith has both covered on the least matches to 7000 runs too. On track to do same with 8000.
Good point you make Pete. I have Williamson ahead of Kholi then as my #2.Smith's conversion rate is very impressive Craig - Williamson isn't too far behind him with 32 50's & 24 100's, what's so amazing about Williamson's stats is we normally only play a one test or two test series & hardly ever play a 3 test series... the big 3 have a big advantage of playing a 4 or 5 test series allowing batsmen to get a much better flow going with their batting.
Going to be a cracker on the last day mate - India need just over 100 per session... hope you put the squeeze on them tomorrow Craig & get early wickets, then keep chipping them out.
Not astonishing mate. Like I say and have always said .. Lyon is accurate but has little penetration because he is a defensive bowler. So a defensive field as India has shown that he can be lofted safely whenever they attack him. Ashwin and the rookie Sundar are also offies but they mostly attack the batsman.it's astonishing he's not placing two close in fielders either side of the bat when Lyon is bowling.
Absolutely Craig - test cricket is far more intriguing than the white ball stuff... in tests it's really about mental toughness & all the little battles that go on within the 5 day game.Pete it is cricket such as we have seen in this entire series that can only be good for the survival of the Test format. White ball cricket just does not get the senses and competitive juices flowing or the nerve ends jangling like an enthralling Test cricket contest does.
Pete this deck is the easiest batting Gabba deck I can recall. Its saving grace may be the cracks which have now opened and will assist our quicks either by the variable bounce or mentally by sewing doubt into their batsmen minds.Can't see India getting 120 per session & unless Paine becomes much more inventive looks to be a certain draw.
spot on mate.Absolutely Craig - test cricket is far more intriguing than the white ball stuff... in tests it's really about mental toughness & all the little battles that go on within the 5 day game.
Agree what you're saying about Lyon - but by having a fielder either side of any batsmen it's going to create much more pressure on them to force them into a mistake... if Paine doesn't start trying different things to try & create wicket taking opportunities this test is going to be a draw.Not astonishing mate. Like I say and have always said .. Lyon is accurate but has little penetration because he is a defensive bowler. So a defensive field as India has shown that he can be lofted safely whenever they attack him. Ashwin and the rookie Sundar are also offies but they mostly attack the batsman.
spot on mate.
Yeah, it doesn't look too difficult to bat on... hope those cracks help your bowlers out Craig.Pete this deck is the easiest batting Gabba deck I can recall. Its saving grace may be the cracks which have now opened and will assist our quicks either by the variable bounce or mentally by sewing doubt into their batsmen minds.
Yeah, bowlers need to bowl accurately in pairs to keep the pressure on... as you say Craig give Green a crack, he can't be any worse than a very erratic Starc.spot on mate.
Same old story with Starc . He lets off the pressure that Cummins, Lyon and Hazlewood have built. Have always said Starc is out attack's weak link. Constantly bowling an out of form bowler is my biggest criticism of Paine. Even Green looks more likely. Least he does not offer freebies.
What shite bowling from Starc - bowling both sides of the wicket giving away gift runs... Paine has to take him off & give Green a goSo frustrating to have this man in your attack when you are trying to win a match as he gives away a boundary almost every over.
Exactly mateThe other thing is a Cummins/Hazlewood partnership is far more potent than the other. So why isnt Paine pairing them more.???