a for effort
Active Member
Re: Twenty20 World Cup Discussion/Match talk thread
I was naming the squad members who can bowl, not a side.
As I said, I would have both of them in my Test side. Collingwood has achieved the absolute best that could be expected out his limited abilities, which is a credit to him, but Bell has not reached full maturity yet. I know he's known for making cute 30's and throwing his wicket away, but in a 20/20 30's will win matches, scratchy run-a-ball 15's at the end of an innings won't.eddiesmith;351673 said:Wow, Ian Bell averages well over 50 does he? Everyone claims Bell is a superbly talented cricketer and Collingwood is a hack, so why is Collys test average higher?
Maybe so, but we are talking about selection for a 20/20 tournament, not a test or one-day series.eddiesmith;351673 said:Why can Collingwood makes runs against top opposition and Bell cant? Even in ODIs they are mighty close given Bell is a batsman and Collingwood an all rounder who has only really been used as a batsman in recent years. Hell since Bell started Collingwood averages more with the bat in ODIs
He was playing fantastically at 6 until they brought him up to 3 to replace Vaughan, and when opening in the ODI's he was as consistent as anyone else they tried in that position.eddiesmith;351673 said:He has had more chances than anyone else would get and simply doesnt perform and maybe they move him around because they are trying to find somewhere they can fit him in, only spot he ever looked good in tests was no6, but we dont play 6 batsmen anymore
Again, we are talking about 20/20'seddiesmith;351673 said:In ODIs he has only ever had a couple of good series and they were at home and for a top order batsman has just 1 century, even Colly has 4
I'm not using anybody as a punching bag, I'm calling it how I see it. Collingwood is a poor captain, and most pundits will back me up on that, and his game is not suited to 20/20 cricket. I'm also not sure what constitutes him 'easily' beating Ian Bell.eddiesmith;351673 said:You claim Bell is a scapegoat, Collingwood is used as a punching bag for most people, you like to do it as well, yet despite a lack of talent he still outperforms Ian Bell easily
I'm not sure what you are trying to say, unless it's that Samit Patel and Rob Key are so fat that they can't make runs and will struggle to play every game?eddiesmith;351673 said:So making runs and being able to play all matches and contribute dont matter?
This is technically true (15 sixes in 16 games), though it would be foolish to try and use such a tiny amount of data to do any kind of statistical analysis.eddiesmith;351673 said:On the sixes comment, averages 1 per innings, Wright 1 every 3 innings, Pietersen about 1 every 2 innings, Collingwood has nearly twice as many 6's as KP and they have the same amount of innings
Economy of nearly 9.5, and 4 of those wickets were against the pathetic Windies a fortnight ago. If England are relying on Collingwoods dibbly-dobblies to do anything other than use up a couple of overs then they should give up noweddiesmith;351673 said:14 wickets @ 18 is more than handy for your 5th bowler
You are a harsh man if you think an average of 23 after 5 T20 internationals could be considered enough chances to chuck him in the 'no good' basketeddiesmith;351673 said:As for Prior, averages just 25 in ODIs and in T20I's, had a few chances and never made runs, how many chances should he get?
eddiesmith;351673 said:If you want to count Bopara, averages about 50 at ODI level and never been trusted in T20Is
Oh btw, whos keeping in your side? You do realise you have just named 10 players and no keeper or Key nor Prior who you want as a batsman alone?
I was naming the squad members who can bowl, not a side.