WDCA Under 17s

Re: WDCA Under 17s

ANCC;203782 said:
haha yeah too bad ill be at another game but if it comes finals time and we have to play ill come watch and ill say ******** but it would be a bit low to hit you haaa seein your double my age so i might just have a laugh instead ayy

your a tosser and you wouldnt come cause your a loser.......anyway willy's a's to destroy altona nth this week........
 
Re: WDCA Under 17s

weapons05/06;203802 said:
your a tosser and you wouldnt come cause your a loser.......anyway willy's a's to destroy altona nth this week........

Calm down weapons ;) . Anyway this week will be an interesting match, lets see if the new willi recruits make a difference along with the others from the start of the season :p .
 
Re: WDCA Under 17s

i dunno many.
in the a's.
umm conway i know is good bowler.
hancock good bat.
scott mills i know decent bowler.
 
Re: WDCA Under 17s

Matty_k;203890 said:
i dunno many.
in the a's.
umm conway i know is good bowler.
hancock good bat.
scott mills i know decent bowler.

im am new to this forum,i watched the willy 17s v altona north this week, and i disagree on conways is a good bowler.scott milss is av,nothing spec and hancock batts to slow.but you cant get him out.
and i did see willy ba too.after getting alton north out for 100 conway comes in and goes for it wit 4 overs to go.******** he can hit a ball but why..he has all day next week.
 
Re: WDCA Under 17s

Matty_k;204582 said:
conway took 5fa in dowling. he cant be that badd.

matty you can add player of the tournament aswell........first or second for the most ever wickets taken in the tournament......fair effort......

now you dills from altona nth........crap performance from a so called top 4 side.....103 was it.....mmmmmmmm.......cricket addict back to the b's chump........lol........blob
cant wait for conway to make a ton in 50 balls...lol......then dan davis to make a ton of 63 balls........then captian pisshead lol to bang 6 sixes in an over........now id love to see that.....where was the great ANCC poofter.......no show but i bet she had a show in her tampon.........
 
Re: WDCA Under 17s

weapons05/06;204597 said:
matty you can add player of the tournament aswell........first or second for the most ever wickets taken in the tournament......fair effort......

now you dills from altona nth........crap performance from a so called top 4 side.....103 was it.....mmmmmmmm.......cricket addict back to the b's chump........lol........blob
cant wait for conway to make a ton in 50 balls...lol......then dan davis to make a ton of 63 balls........then captian pisshead lol to bang 6 sixes in an over........now id love to see that.....where was the great ANCC poofter.......no show but i bet she had a show in her tampon.........

109 it was, and yeh was very very ordinary. Oh well, we'll learn from it. Still two games after this until finals.

I wish there's a leg side wide rule in juniors. How many balls did willi bowl down leg? Heaps.

Why would i go back to the b's. Cause i made a duck. First of all i wasn't alone in not making runs. And second i'm not even a batsman you dill :p.

And ANCC can't go to h&a games. I thot you knew that weapons.

Btw the games not over yet.
 
Re: WDCA Under 17s

weapons05/06;203179 said:
yer im not braging about anything im just talking my jnr club up to be the best and we are renound for that..........

i know of 6 players that played dowling....and 3 in the u/18 w/spirit side i think that were still eligable...but im unsure of how the comp goes about picking their jnr rep sides and to be honest i coached the w.d.c.a under 21 rep team sent out 35 letters to players and first session got 5 players......dissapointing yes in the end got 13 players and to be honest not the best players that i know that are running around but they did the job and were very competitive......with 2 wins and a loss.......while it is dissapointing from my point of view cant really comment on the lower grade rep teams

and im pretty sure if you get a werribee or willy side to play against these so called rep teams they would probably give them a run for their money......
as if your not bragging, you think your a hero coz you coachedd a team and want all the credit, they would have won it with out you.|@ |@
 
Re: WDCA Under 17s

iknowyou;204458 said:
im am new to this forum,i watched the willy 17s v altona north this week, and i disagree on conways is a good bowler.scott milss is av,nothing spec and hancock batts to slow.but you cant get him out.
and i did see willy ba too.after getting alton north out for 100 conway comes in and goes for it wit 4 overs to go.******** he can hit a ball but why..he has all day next week.

Maybe Conway went for it this week because he cant play next week you never know. Mate your making judgements on 1 days performance. Did you notice he still got 2 fa? getting both the opening batsmen out which is what a opening bowler is meant to do isn't it? He also kept and stumped cricket addict down legside for a quack lol. Mills didn't have a great game but got 4 fa last week so his form isn't to bad.
 
Re: WDCA Under 17s

Cricket Addict;204672 said:
109 it was, and yeh was very very ordinary. Oh well, we'll learn from it. Still two games after this until finals.

I wish there's a leg side wide rule in juniors. How many balls did willi bowl down leg? Heaps.

Why would i go back to the b's. Cause i made a duck. First of all i wasn't alone in not making runs. And second i'm not even a batsman you dill :p.

And ANCC can't go to h&a games. I thot you knew that weapons.

Btw the games not over yet.

I dont think you should be critical on our bowling we did knock you's over for 109 didnt we?

Interesting you saying that the game isn't over i cant wait to pile the runs on this week maybe make 300 odd.
 
Re: WDCA Under 17s

weapons05/06;204597 said:
matty you can add player of the tournament aswell........first or second for the most ever wickets taken in the tournament......fair effort......

now you dills from altona nth........crap performance from a so called top 4 side.....103 was it.....mmmmmmmm.......cricket addict back to the b's chump........lol........blob
cant wait for conway to make a ton in 50 balls...lol......then dan davis to make a ton of 63 balls........then captian pisshead lol to bang 6 sixes in an over........now id love to see that.....where was the great ANCC poofter.......no show but i bet she had a show in her tampon.........

Captain pisshead bit harsh lol.
Especially coming from you lol.
 
Re: WDCA Under 17s

Young Willi Lad;204846 said:
I dont think you should be critical on our bowling we did knock you's over for 109 didnt we?

Interesting you saying that the game isn't over i cant wait to pile the runs on this week maybe make 300 odd.


There were some wickets that i thought we lost because of us. But not to take credit away. All you can do is get the batsman out which is what you did.

About the leg-side rule, i'd just rather see it called as a wide. I know yeh it should be put away if it's down there. But there's some you just can't hit. I know it's juniors but i'd just like to see it happen. Maybe only when it's really wide or something.

You never know what might happen. What do you need, 83 runs? 9 wickets in hand. It's possible.
 
Re: WDCA Under 17s

Cricket Addict;205106 said:
There were some wickets that i thought we lost because of us. But not to take credit away. All you can do is get the batsman out which is what you did.

About the leg-side rule, i'd just rather see it called as a wide. I know yeh it should be put away if it's down there. But there's some you just can't hit. I know it's juniors but i'd just like to see it happen. Maybe only when it's really wide or something.

You never know what might happen. What do you need, 83 runs? 9 wickets in hand. It's possible.

We will just have to wait and see won't we.
 
Re: WDCA Under 17s

Cricket Addict;205106 said:
There were some wickets that i thought we lost because of us. But not to take credit away. All you can do is get the batsman out which is what you did.

About the leg-side rule, i'd just rather see it called as a wide. I know yeh it should be put away if it's down there. But there's some you just can't hit. I know it's juniors but i'd just like to see it happen. Maybe only when it's really wide or something.

You never know what might happen. What do you need, 83 runs? 9 wickets in hand. It's possible.

if you know someone with an oxy torch, bring it down and burn a few holes in that synthetic crap, just short of a good length.
 
Re: WDCA Under 17s

Cricket Addict;205106 said:
There were some wickets that i thought we lost because of us. But not to take credit away. All you can do is get the batsman out which is what you did.

About the leg-side rule, i'd just rather see it called as a wide. I know yeh it should be put away if it's down there. But there's some you just can't hit. I know it's juniors but i'd just like to see it happen. Maybe only when it's really wide or something.

You never know what might happen. What do you need, 83 runs? 9 wickets in hand. It's possible.


walk in the park.........you bowled ok.......dunno about your teamates riff raff chit chat when you's are getting flogged.........if you think about it willy's top 5 bats didnt get a hit and still got flogged.........show's the gap between the top half of the 4 and the bottom half......nick rainone 98 should have tonned up im sure in the same predicament again he would take all the singles not look for boundries.......good effort seing he usually bats at 9......
 
Re: WDCA Under 17s

weapons05/06;205783 said:
walk in the park.........you bowled ok.......dunno about your teamates riff raff chit chat when you's are getting flogged.........if you think about it willy's top 5 bats didnt get a hit and still got flogged.........show's the gap between the top half of the 4 and the bottom half......nick rainone 98 should have tonned up im sure in the same predicament again he would take all the singles not look for boundries.......good effort seing he usually bats at 9......

the captain of AN is dog man, whats his name, spit or sumthing
putting everyone on the boundary so he cant hit runs
then if im right, caught him out on 98
smart bit of captaincy though@|
 
Back
Top