Billy Bowden
Member
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
In regards to the Chris Smith Carry on on Grand Final Day, there are a couple of incidents which need to be treated seperatly.
In regards to sitting on the pitch and protesting, I don't think that was a real problem. It was a harmless and peaceful protest that didn't really hurt anyone. Instead of ringing the police to come and remove him, perhaps a few fielding drills where the players throwing cricket balls at his head might have moved him quick.
The areas where Chris needs to be pulled into line is for the foul mouth abuse towards St Andrews players while they were fielding and the aggresive abuse towards Claude Dunn (80 year old President of the WSUCCA). Whether you agree or disagree about the decision on the semi final fiasco, to have a go at Claude in a threatening manner is pretty piss poor. I think Fine Legs is right by saying that with Families and children around, the foul and abusive language was not appropriate.
At the end of the day the Association have to make the decision whether they charge him or not. As for the Roosters committee, they to need to determine whether they disapline him or not. I am sure the Association will make a desicion in due time whether they report him or not. I know you guys at the Roosters really like to put out there that you are a family club with strong Junior Participation and that is fantastic, but was Chris's behaviour appropriate for a family club?
In regards to the Chris Smith Carry on on Grand Final Day, there are a couple of incidents which need to be treated seperatly.
In regards to sitting on the pitch and protesting, I don't think that was a real problem. It was a harmless and peaceful protest that didn't really hurt anyone. Instead of ringing the police to come and remove him, perhaps a few fielding drills where the players throwing cricket balls at his head might have moved him quick.
The areas where Chris needs to be pulled into line is for the foul mouth abuse towards St Andrews players while they were fielding and the aggresive abuse towards Claude Dunn (80 year old President of the WSUCCA). Whether you agree or disagree about the decision on the semi final fiasco, to have a go at Claude in a threatening manner is pretty piss poor. I think Fine Legs is right by saying that with Families and children around, the foul and abusive language was not appropriate.
At the end of the day the Association have to make the decision whether they charge him or not. As for the Roosters committee, they to need to determine whether they disapline him or not. I am sure the Association will make a desicion in due time whether they report him or not. I know you guys at the Roosters really like to put out there that you are a family club with strong Junior Participation and that is fantastic, but was Chris's behaviour appropriate for a family club?