Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
water_boy;367407 said:This has nothing to do with leg-spin. But do any of the English guys on this thread know a Lancashire fast-bowler Oliver Newby? Because he will be playing at my club this summer in Australia and is arriving in about a month.
someblokecalleddave;367585 said:There's some stuff on the internet about Newby - do a google search. Anyway some good news. It sounds as though the technician at work has ordered the 2 high speed digital compact cameras I was ranting about, so if they come in over the next week or so and the weather here in the UK holds out I'll be competing with Jim to come up with some youtube slow mo releases.
macca;367589 said:The way jim has overlaid those two videos is a spinout. I hope you can do it with some of your stuff dave.
Jim2109;367594 said:awesome, it will be interesting to see someone elses action in slow motion as well so ive got something to compare to.
make sure you get plenty of shots of your wrong'un. its the one delivery i cant even get close to bowling and youve got it mastered. so im curious to see how its done!! im also curious to see what these cameras are capable of, especially at 1000fps. my slowest motion videos are resampled to essentially 960fps, but they miss out 3 of every 4 frames by comparison to a true 1000fps camera, but still give a very clear picture of what is happening. so seeing the extra frames, and also having the potential to slow it down even more to 2000fps (the same as the Sky Sports slow motion shots) will give the same kind of insight as the slow motion videos of Shane Warne on Youtube do. youll definitely be able to see the fingers gradually unfurling then as the ball is released.
sadspinner;367866 said:Jim, congrats again about the shots. The part of superimposing your leg break with your offspinning flipper where really ingenious, looked like hawk eye, might get employed by sky, so you had better patent your idea! What was interesting was the way the two balls crossed in the air with drift in opposite ways, and then crossed again on pitching. I am a bit jealous of your beautiful wrist movements to bowl the leg break. Unfortunately I notice my wtist is not as flexible, so I will never get that action myself. Went to have a bowl yesterday after 2 weeks and filmed myself with an oldish sony camcorder, and was not very impressed with what I saw. A sort of drunk Grimmett with a flailing semi paralysed left arm that did not do much good to my line, though my length was goodish. Got some to turn a lot though at least even though as stated accuracy was not so great. Funnily enough I resaw one of grimmetts videos where there is bradman commenting on him and I bowl the googly in the same way, even though the line and speed are nothing to be too proud about.
Dave, do you find that using a different ball for consecutive deliveries, puts your bowling off. Some I seem to grip well and spin more than the others. The majority are Ca balls and the rest that are worse are the kookubarra crown and the red and white readers that is really hopeless.
macca;367872 said:They changed the official size of the ball and stumps during Grimmetts career . The ball was made smaller and although you would think that would be better for the spinner Bradman wrote that Grimmett said he prefered the older, bigger ball before the rule change as it spun more he thought.
someblokecalleddave;367875 said:Here we go the most recent footage of me bowling from about 3 weeks ago.
1. The flailing leading arm.
2. The step out in front of the stumps which in this clips isn't as bad as I thought.
3. 270 degree (Almost) rotation.
4. The weird little skip
YouTube - someblokecalleddave Leg breaks
TheGreasyPole;368113 said:Hi Everyone.
As you can guess, I'm a n00b..... but not just on the site, to wrist spin bowling as well..... to give you a flavour.....
I've been a big cricket fan since university, but hadn't played since a couple of games at school. Then about 2 years ago I found myself living opposite an army barracks with a couple of nets. I was figuring out a way to try and give myself some light exercise....... so I thought I'd see how easy it was to be Shane Warne, nipped over their fence, and used their nets.
Not very easy, it turns out.
Anyway, I had great fun just trying to keep it on the pitch and perhaps went 3 dozen times for an hour or so just mucking about. This led, of course, to spinning it around the house all the time causing my g/friend to get terminally pissed off with random "cracks!" as I missed the catch and it fell on our hard floors.
Then I went travelling for a year, round the world trip, and took my ball with me. I maybe bowled another 3 dozen sessions all over the world.
Now I'm back I paced out a pitch opposite a chain link fence in a park near work, and am using the pole holding up the fence as the "wicket".
So recently I started all over again, every dry lunchtime for 45-50min, and this time I'm taking it a bit more seriously. I figure if I'm doing this for a more fun way to exercise...... I may as well take it seriously enough to get good and join a club some way down the line (I am NOWHERE near good enough right now).
In this SomeBlokeCalledDave's blogs have been invaluable.... and this thread is certainly full of top medium/advanced tips...... but I'm still a Looooooooooooong way from the standard of anyone here.
Seriously. A long way short.
Now, I'm aware that I'm probably looking at a year or two's practice here before I'm confident enough in my bowling to go join a team and I've decided I'd like to put that in. Maybe I've done 80 hours practice so far (and this over 3 years so hardly consistent enough to seriously improve), and I'm thinking it's going to take hundreds of hours, consistently, to get good. 200-300+ easily. Especially as I don't participate in any other sports, so I am hardly a natural athlete (I'm also 33)
So, I'd like to solicit some advice to help me out at this very early stage.......
Of course, a lot of the basic, and important, stuff is on Dave's blogs already (or on these big cricket threads) and so I won't be asking about things that are already very well covered (and, trust me, I'm soaking up and using all the information you guys are providing, especially on body/wrist action) but some things I want to know I just can't find. So .... some questions......
1) My current "metric" for improvement.
I currently divide my balls into 3 groups.
Wides - Those that leave the pitch or are so wide of the wicket down each side that they're, frankly, pathetic. Still a lot of these at this early stage, although I go through "good patches" where I don't bowl a wide for 2 or 3 overs.
Good Balls - Those that hit a patch I mark out about 1.5m long by 80cm wide. This patch is located 1.5 short of the popping crease at it's fullest edge, and with the leg side edge of the patch in line with leg stump, it covers a length roughly from 1.5-3m from the crease, and width from leg stump to 40cm outside off. I know this ain't great.... but I figure if they pitch here they aren't horrific.
Bad Balls - Anything that doesn't hit the patch (including balls in line that are full tosses/far too short) and isn't a wide.
On a good day..... I'd break down over 18 balls roughly 8 good, 8 bad, 2 wides...... and have no control of line/length within the patch so I clearly have some way to go.
In your opinion is this a good way to start thinking about this early on ?
I know later I'll want to shrink this patch..... or start to get control of line and length within it..... but do you think this is a good starting approach ? We can call it the "get it roughly in the right area" approach for beginners.
Are there any suggestions for a better way to approach this right at the start (I am a very long way from hitting a dinner plate at will).
Also, am I locating my "patch" correctly. After reading the blogs I've moved it slightly (making any balls wide of leg "bad" balls) but is it too wide ? too long ? Not long enough ? Not wide enough ? Have I got it "roughly in the right area" ?
2) How good is good enough ?
For all the help and assistance all these blogs/boards offer on technique, line, length, tactics and so on...... they seem to offer little advice on the order of "get this good before you consider a team".
I have little interest in joining a club unless I'm "reasonable" enough not to embarass myself in the nets (forget bowling in a match for now). Especially given this boards sage advice concerning "batsmen who think whacking the leggy in the nets is a great laugh, even though in a real match I'd have them kacking their pants )
What advice could you offer along the lines of "If I was hitting an area Xcm by Ycm roughly Z% of the time placed HERE, I'd consider that 'good enough' to go join a team" ?
You guys all talk about hitting dinner plates or hitting the line of off 5/6...... and I'm sure that great for you guys who have already put the "hard yards" in to be good enough to be in the clubs and playing for teams..... but that seems one hell of a long way off for me.
Do I have to hit a plate sized area 5 balls out of 6 to consider joining a club ? Or would a larger area, or lower percentage, do at the start .... with continued improvement to come ?
I was considering roughly hitting my patch 9 balls out of 12 and 1 wide per 3-4 overs being a reasonable standard to join a club, but advice would be appreciated.
3) Early practicing technique.
Right now I concentrate (90%+) on leg spin. Maybe 8% on some top spinners (with which I am more accurate) and chucking the occasional flipper/google attempt down for a bit of fun once or twice a session. I think from comments in the thread that this is probably right for a "from scratch starter".
I also have far greater accuracy with a "2 walking steps -> Action" approach.... if I jog in (or attempt a full run up) my accuracy (such as it is) gets even worse. Any advice on whether (IYO) it's better to stick with this "two step walk -> action" and then add a "proper" jog/skip run up once accuracy is gained....... or..... go for the full run up now (sod the accuracy costs) and develop accuracy from there ?
I'm often in two minds about this and worry that in using a "two walking step -> action" approach I am training myself in a bad habit that will force me to learn "all over again" at a later date although it does allow me to conentrate on my action/wrist.
In a similar vein...... I am currently using a "two up-two down grip" with my wrist half cocked at about 45deg (fully cocked causes me to pull loads down for wides)...... again the idea is to get accuracy with this then increase the wrist to the full 90 deg cock. Again..... IYO...... better to go "full cocked" from the start (and sod the accuracy for now) or to stay "half cocked", get the accuracy, then increase the cock, and so the spin gained from it ?
One more thing......... something I've picked up that I haven't seen anyone else mention...... I notice that (when using the full cock) I find I can produce leggies more easily with it cocked pointing straight down the wicket before curling the arm up for the full action (where it points at my chest). I discovered that if I turn this 90deg so it is cocked pointing at my leg (or accross my chest when curled) it makes it easier with the top-spinners. Finally, if I hold it cocked pointing away from the wicket before curling the arm (or in a kind of striking snake pose down the wicket when curled) I can produce googlies, and this is the ONLY way I've found of producing balls that go the other way.
It seems to set my arm up so that, when bowling, it places my wrist "automitically-ish" in the right postion at release for each delivery (although it means the googly is almost all finger, not wrist action, and so only deviates a small amount, say 10-20cm with a good ball)..... has anyone else anything to say about this ? Might it help others who can't "get" certain deliveries ? Is it a "bad" way to go about the googly, in that it removes almost all (80%?) wrist action from it ?
It's not as if I'm trying to get a good googly at present, and it doesn't interfere witht he wrist action on leg/top so It's no biggie....... but I wondered if anyone else experienced something similar or had a "For gods sake don't do THAT" reaction to it ?
Thats pretty much it for now........ any advice gratefully received.....
Yours,
TGP