someblokecalleddave
Well-Known Member
Re: Wrist Spin Bowling (Part Two)
I've just done a review of the season on my main blog at Wrist Spin Bowling looking at what I intended to do in the way of goals and acheivements and looking at it I surpassed all my goals massively with my figures looking like this -
54-12-267-21
Average 12.71
RPO 4.86
Strike Rate 15.69
Best Bowling 4-27
In comparison with my first full year 2008 it's an enormous improvement and when I first set my targets they were quite modest. Thinking about the figures and comparing them with the other spinners it looks as though that given more opportunities to play cricket I'd potentially be snapping at the heels of the clubs best spinner Neil Samwell. But I also acknowledge that with bowling more overs there's the potential to have more bad games and these figures may not be so good. But then with more experience wouldn't there also be a counter argument that my bowling might improve?
Statistically as a percentage I bowl more maidens than anyone else with the exception of one other person and I've got the 2nd best Strike rate in the team as well. Additionally I step up to the plate and bowl as an opener whereas the bloke with the highest average bowls further down the order at the Bunnies.
Today I had an exceptionally productive practice session probably bowling better than I have ever done before. I've changed my approach to my bowling in that I've now given up on all the experimental variations and now just focus on my 4 main deliveries and this seems to already being a very productive move. Evaluating todays performance and looking at ways to improve again for next year at the same kind of rate the only thing that I can think of that will make a big difference is my understanding of bowling length.
On many ocassions I've commented on the abilities of some of the more experienced and older bowlers in my team and oppositions team. The general observation is that they don't bowl fast or turn the ball all they seem to do that seems to cause so many problems and gets them wickets is the bowling of a good length. So after all this waffle the basic question I need to ask is - what's the score with bowling a good length?
I've just done a review of the season on my main blog at Wrist Spin Bowling looking at what I intended to do in the way of goals and acheivements and looking at it I surpassed all my goals massively with my figures looking like this -
54-12-267-21
Average 12.71
RPO 4.86
Strike Rate 15.69
Best Bowling 4-27
In comparison with my first full year 2008 it's an enormous improvement and when I first set my targets they were quite modest. Thinking about the figures and comparing them with the other spinners it looks as though that given more opportunities to play cricket I'd potentially be snapping at the heels of the clubs best spinner Neil Samwell. But I also acknowledge that with bowling more overs there's the potential to have more bad games and these figures may not be so good. But then with more experience wouldn't there also be a counter argument that my bowling might improve?
Statistically as a percentage I bowl more maidens than anyone else with the exception of one other person and I've got the 2nd best Strike rate in the team as well. Additionally I step up to the plate and bowl as an opener whereas the bloke with the highest average bowls further down the order at the Bunnies.
Today I had an exceptionally productive practice session probably bowling better than I have ever done before. I've changed my approach to my bowling in that I've now given up on all the experimental variations and now just focus on my 4 main deliveries and this seems to already being a very productive move. Evaluating todays performance and looking at ways to improve again for next year at the same kind of rate the only thing that I can think of that will make a big difference is my understanding of bowling length.
On many ocassions I've commented on the abilities of some of the more experienced and older bowlers in my team and oppositions team. The general observation is that they don't bowl fast or turn the ball all they seem to do that seems to cause so many problems and gets them wickets is the bowling of a good length. So after all this waffle the basic question I need to ask is - what's the score with bowling a good length?