Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Caesar;331016 said:On the McDonald/Bollinger debate, let me say first and foremost I think we should be comparing them solely as bowlers. We are talking about selecting a fourth bowler here, and our batting lineup is long enough. Any batting proficiency in the player selected is a bonus.
IIRC there isn't much between McDonald and Bollinger's FC records. Last time I checked Micky D had a marginally better average and Bollingball had a marginally better strike rate.
But I think the biggest mistake is making this decision on the basis of statistics. Sure, statistics are an excellent indicator but when they're that close then you should be using other factors to differentiate the players. Most importantly, how do they fit in with the rest of the attack? Bollinger is a strike bowler, McDonald keeps it tight and relies on the other bowlers to build the pressure for him to take his wickets. Of the three other bowlers already selected for this Test, Siddle is already performing that job, Hilfy is a pure strike bowler and Johnson is a happy medium between the two.
Do we really need another bowler who specialises in keeping things tight? Especially without a spinner. Remember, one of the main reasons we aren't playing a spinner is because we didn't have one offensive enough to take wickets aggressively.
I think that if you play four pacemen with McDonald as one of them, you're going to struggle to take wickets when it counts because your attack isn't going to have enough teeth. Sure, maybe if the other three are all aggressive strike bowlers who are going to build the pressure he needs to take his wickets. Sure, if he's playing as an actual allrounder as a supplement to a balanced attack. But not I think under the current arrangements.
We'll see today how he goes, and possibly next Test if he gets a go. But I think the bowling attack has the wrong balance with him in it - either it changes, or he goes.
Australia's euphoria over their big win in Monday's first Test against South Africa has faded with fast bowlers Peter Siddle and Ben Hilfenhaus in doubt for Friday's second Test because of injuries.
Siddle has left-foot soreness and Hilfenhaus is carrying a lower-back complaint.
Steve Magoffin is suddenly in line for his Test debut after chairman of selectors Andrew Hilditch announced the West Australian paceman would be flown to Durban "as a precautionary measure".
Uncapped Tasmanian quick Brett Geeves is also chasing a Test debut after joining the squad this week following NSW left-armer Doug Bollinger's abdominal-muscle strain while bowling in the nets after being named 12th man for the Johannesburg Test.
Magoffin, 29, is the second-leading wicket-taker in the Sheffield Shield this summer with 38 at 22.86, one more than the 26-year-old Geeves who has 37 victims at 23.86. (Brett Dorey has 42.)
Geeves has also scored 343 runs at 38.11, almost identical to Magoffin's 381 at 38.10.
Siddle, who was man of the match with eight wickets in Australia's win over South Africa in the third Test in Sydney, claimed a further six wickets in Monday's first Test in Johannesburg.
Hilfenhaus was also impressive, taking three wickets on debut in Johannesburg and getting nice shape on his outswingers.
"With Ben and Peter suffering some soreness following the first Test, and with such a short turnaround between the first and second Test, the National Selection Panel has taken the precaution of adding another bowler to the squad," Hilditch said in a statement released late on Tuesday South African time.