Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
crktluva;336969 said:Danny hughes will win div 1 sts batting average, 96.5 according to my cricket, just pipped hornet at 95.2
rain sucks mate.. happens to all the good sides as well as the kids... south barwon must be reeeling rite now... there 1's were a better side than 4th and becoz groveyu got rolled they end up with nothing... not good by the gca for having juniors on the winter reserve ground today and yesterday morning before such an important clashRenny24;336975 said:Well the St Peters' 3rd XI dream is over. 81 in response to AT's 206. 9 dropped catches and beaten by the better side on the day. Three unsuccessful campaigns in a row.
On another note, St Peters u/17s (4th) V Murgheboluc (3rd): Murghe 7/154 off their 55 (21 on Sat). St Peters given 16 overs to make the runs and made 6/125. Everyone knows the rules and you play within them but surely something not right there? 3rd beats 4th in the granny and the lower side has 16 overs to make the same runs when the opposition has 55. Could have been a reserve day or they could have easily played longer today. Not sour grapes by any stretch; still would have been unfair if the shoe was on the other foot.
Renny24;336975 said:Well the St Peters' 3rd XI dream is over. 81 in response to AT's 206. 9 dropped catches and beaten by the better side on the day. Three unsuccessful campaigns in a row.
On another note, St Peters u/17s (4th) V Murgheboluc (3rd): Murghe 7/154 off their 55 (21 on Sat). St Peters given 16 overs to make the runs and made 6/125. Everyone knows the rules and you play within them but surely something not right there? 3rd beats 4th in the granny and the lower side has 16 overs to make the same runs when the opposition has 55. Could have been a reserve day or they could have easily played longer today. Not sour grapes by any stretch; still would have been unfair if the shoe was on the other foot.
I Bowl Meat Pies;336980 said:rain sucks mate.. happens to all the good sides as well as the kids... south barwon must be reeeling rite now... there 1's were a better side than 4th and becoz groveyu got rolled they end up with nothing... not good by the gca for having juniors on the winter reserve ground today and yesterday morning before such an important clash
rain sucks mate.. happens to all the good sides as well as the kids... south barwon must be reeeling rite now... there 1's were a better side than 4th and becoz groveyu got rolled they end up with nothing... not good by the gca for having juniors on the winter reserve ground today and yesterday morning before such an important clashRenny24;336975 said:Well the St Peters' 3rd XI dream is over. 81 in response to AT's 206. 9 dropped catches and beaten by the better side on the day. Three unsuccessful campaigns in a row.
On another note, St Peters u/17s (4th) V Murgheboluc (3rd): Murghe 7/154 off their 55 (21 on Sat). St Peters given 16 overs to make the runs and made 6/125. Everyone knows the rules and you play within them but surely something not right there? 3rd beats 4th in the granny and the lower side has 16 overs to make the same runs when the opposition has 55. Could have been a reserve day or they could have easily played longer today. Not sour grapes by any stretch; still would have been unfair if the shoe was on the other foot.
bigmacimhungry;336340 said:As an insider WITH the knowledge ther is no way known that that pitch was playable(yes i was there)...and to hang around until the stated " 3;30" would have been an utter waste of time as 1/2 the Torquay players were at Murghe before the bus load of Murghe players arrived, BEFORE tea at 3.15!!!!! so how can 1 say it was playable at 3.30 when they are not even there!!!!!and strange how it was the wicket on the highest part of the table with the most moisture!!!!!!oh they got into the finals thou didnt they....what a suprise.
Renny24;336975 said:Well the St Peters' 3rd XI dream is over. 81 in response to AT's 206. 9 dropped catches and beaten by the better side on the day. Three unsuccessful campaigns in a row.
On another note, St Peters u/17s (4th) V Murgheboluc (3rd): Murghe 7/154 off their 55 (21 on Sat). St Peters given 16 overs to make the runs and made 6/125. Everyone knows the rules and you play within them but surely something not right there? 3rd beats 4th in the granny and the lower side has 16 overs to make the same runs when the opposition has 55. Could have been a reserve day or they could have easily played longer today. Not sour grapes by any stretch; still would have been unfair if the shoe was on the other foot.
I Bowl Meat Pies;336980 said:rain sucks mate.. happens to all the good sides as well as the kids... south barwon must be reeeling rite now... there 1's were a better side than 4th and becoz groveyu got rolled they end up with nothing... not good by the gca for having juniors on the winter reserve ground today and yesterday morning before such an important clash
beaublazer;337013 said:What happened this week frogs? Pitch unplayable again? Must of been the same cloud that hung over Torquay last week you whinging bunch of sooks. All in all a great result for cricket.
Also get of the phone to the addy you bunch of women
bigmacimhungry;336340 said:As an insider WITH the knowledge ther is no way known that that pitch was playable(yes i was there)...and to hang around until the stated " 3;30" would have been an utter waste of time as 1/2 the Torquay players were at Murghe before the bus load of Murghe players arrived, BEFORE tea at 3.15!!!!! so how can 1 say it was playable at 3.30 when they are not even there!!!!!and strange how it was the wicket on the highest part of the table with the most moisture!!!!!!oh they got into the finals thou didnt they....what a suprise.
beaublazer;337013 said:What happened this week frogs? Pitch unplayable again? Must of been the same cloud that hung over Torquay last week you whinging bunch of sooks. All in all a great result for cricket.
Also get of the phone to the addy you bunch of women
I Bowl Meat Pies;336980 said:rain sucks mate.. happens to all the good sides as well as the kids... south barwon must be reeeling rite now... there 1's were a better side than 4th and becoz groveyu got rolled they end up with nothing... not good by the gca for having juniors on the winter reserve ground today and yesterday morning before such an important clash
crktluva;337026 said:y does it not surprise me that the idiotic GCA had juniors on a senior ground during finals in bad weather, what a bunch of tools. when will people get sick of these fools in charge and turf em out and get a decent executive comittee. and b4 you ask, no i dont have the time.
I Bowl Meat Pies;336980 said:rain sucks mate.. happens to all the good sides as well as the kids... south barwon must be reeeling rite now... there 1's were a better side than 4th and becoz groveyu got rolled they end up with nothing... not good by the gca for having juniors on the winter reserve ground today and yesterday morning before such an important clash
a for effort;337034 said:To be fair, the U17 Division 1 final is always played at winter reserve and was scheduled long before the weather was forecast. Ideally the seniors would have a final 4 instead of this ridiculous final 6 system, which would mean this week would be the last of the regular season and there would be no overlap.
crktluva;337026 said:y does it not surprise me that the idiotic GCA had juniors on a senior ground during finals in bad weather, what a bunch of tools. when will people get sick of these fools in charge and turf em out and get a decent executive comittee. and b4 you ask, no i dont have the time.
a for effort;337034 said:To be fair, the U17 Division 1 final is always played at winter reserve and was scheduled long before the weather was forecast. Ideally the seniors would have a final 4 instead of this ridiculous final 6 system, which would mean this week would be the last of the regular season and there would be no overlap.
a for effort;337034 said:To be fair, the U17 Division 1 final is always played at winter reserve and was scheduled long before the weather was forecast. Ideally the seniors would have a final 4 instead of this ridiculous final 6 system, which would mean this week would be the last of the regular season and there would be no overlap.
yerr ur right mate.. last year they played on hard wicket.. this year it was decided early that it would be a turf ground that wasnt hosting seniors finals.. yet becoz east were in there they were the first to put there hands up.. and the stoopid gca commitee say yerr why not... in the end have ruined south's season... and well had east of been sitting 4th would the same thing have occured.. i dont think so... thats my opinion anywaySHANEBOURNEorWARNE;337038 said:Not on the turf it's not. St Albans lost the U17 div 1 Grand Final to East Belmont last year on the bottom ground.
I do agree however that it should be a final 4
a for effort;337034 said:To be fair, the U17 Division 1 final is always played at winter reserve and was scheduled long before the weather was forecast. Ideally the seniors would have a final 4 instead of this ridiculous final 6 system, which would mean this week would be the last of the regular season and there would be no overlap.
SHANEBOURNEorWARNE;337038 said:Not on the turf it's not. St Albans lost the U17 div 1 Grand Final to East Belmont last year on the bottom ground.
I do agree however that it should be a final 4
yerr ur right mate.. last year they played on hard wicket.. this year it was decided early that it would be a turf ground that wasnt hosting seniors finals.. yet becoz east were in there they were the first to put there hands up.. and the stoopid gca commitee say yerr why not... in the end have ruined south's season... and well had east of been sitting 4th would the same thing have occured.. i dont think so... thats my opinion anywaySHANEBOURNEorWARNE;337038 said:Not on the turf it's not. St Albans lost the U17 div 1 Grand Final to East Belmont last year on the bottom ground.
I do agree however that it should be a final 4
SHANEBOURNEorWARNE;337038 said:Not on the turf it's not. St Albans lost the U17 div 1 Grand Final to East Belmont last year on the bottom ground.
I do agree however that it should be a final 4
crktluva;337107 said:i bowl meat pies, BINGO!!! if east had have been playing different scenario, and renny if thats true about nguyens 100, umpire should be shot.
crktluva;337107 said:i bowl meat pies, BINGO!!! if east had have been playing different scenario, and renny if thats true about nguyens 100, umpire should be shot.
ants14;337193 said:A FOR EFFORT GET OUT OF MY PAPER
ants14;337193 said:A FOR EFFORT GET OUT OF MY PAPER