Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
- Thread starter borntigerfan
- Start date
- Status
edges and benson
New Member
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Yes Tayls and we are very good at it and have been over a long time
tayls;336954 said:
Yes Tayls and we are very good at it and have been over a long time
edges and benson
New Member
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Yes Tayls and we are very good at it and have been over a long time
tayls;336954 said:
Yes Tayls and we are very good at it and have been over a long time
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Haha ur probably right Mick, but our rooms will be atlantshaws res where they are currently but getting old ones pulled down and new ones build, and as for the ground we currently have altona green but hopefully we'll have a ground to call home for next season not 100% yet depends what the club decides to do next season aswell. Very excited about new rooms though ours are bout 30 years old, so fresh start and hopefully more functions.
Haha ur probably right Mick, but our rooms will be atlantshaws res where they are currently but getting old ones pulled down and new ones build, and as for the ground we currently have altona green but hopefully we'll have a ground to call home for next season not 100% yet depends what the club decides to do next season aswell. Very excited about new rooms though ours are bout 30 years old, so fresh start and hopefully more functions.
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Haha ur probably right Mick, but our rooms will be atlantshaws res where they are currently but getting old ones pulled down and new ones build, and as for the ground we currently have altona green but hopefully we'll have a ground to call home for next season not 100% yet depends what the club decides to do next season aswell. Very excited about new rooms though ours are bout 30 years old, so fresh start and hopefully more functions.
Haha ur probably right Mick, but our rooms will be atlantshaws res where they are currently but getting old ones pulled down and new ones build, and as for the ground we currently have altona green but hopefully we'll have a ground to call home for next season not 100% yet depends what the club decides to do next season aswell. Very excited about new rooms though ours are bout 30 years old, so fresh start and hopefully more functions.
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Yeah that's right mate it's anbys old ground that's where we are based and yeah it had turf bout 25 years ago so that's the plan to get turf back but yeah council does come into play but so does money and the drought. But apparntly there's 5 pitchs there so it would make a fantastic ground and over all home base for us. Anyway blokes time for bed 3am start bloody Mondays have a good one.
Yeah that's right mate it's anbys old ground that's where we are based and yeah it had turf bout 25 years ago so that's the plan to get turf back but yeah council does come into play but so does money and the drought. But apparntly there's 5 pitchs there so it would make a fantastic ground and over all home base for us. Anyway blokes time for bed 3am start bloody Mondays have a good one.
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Yeah that's right mate it's anbys old ground that's where we are based and yeah it had turf bout 25 years ago so that's the plan to get turf back but yeah council does come into play but so does money and the drought. But apparntly there's 5 pitchs there so it would make a fantastic ground and over all home base for us. Anyway blokes time for bed 3am start bloody Mondays have a good one.
Yeah that's right mate it's anbys old ground that's where we are based and yeah it had turf bout 25 years ago so that's the plan to get turf back but yeah council does come into play but so does money and the drought. But apparntly there's 5 pitchs there so it would make a fantastic ground and over all home base for us. Anyway blokes time for bed 3am start bloody Mondays have a good one.
Billy Bowden
Member
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Mick
I am only going by what Gooky told me mate and as he was in all the meetings and new what was going on I took him on his word. As there were a whole lot of different versions getting thrown around I thought Gooky's version would be alot more relevant than half the crap that has been said on this forum. What you have said above makes alot of sense as well. Also I have been quite open in saying that I felt the Association made the wrong desicion and the games should have been replayed. Just didn't agree with alot of the acusations getting thrown around by a few people from your club and the Roosters.
As for me being an umpire and therefore I should't be commenting on this forum, well sorry mate I think your wrong there. As I said to Nathan Moon on a previous post, when it come to umpiring I will always be impartial, objective and umpire to the laws of cricket. I have umpired St Andrews games before with my brothers playing and I have never favoured them. However when it comes to issues involved with this Association, I will and I am entitled to have my 2 bobs worth like everyone else does.
As for your over rates mate, sorry but not only me, but my fellow umpires and your fellow team mates say you push the boundries when bowling your overs.
Anyway, we've all had our say and there is no hard feelings from my end if there has been any misunderstandings.
Facts;336998 said:Adam,
This is Mick Callus here champ.
What you need to understand here is that I didn't get anything wrong at all!
I spoke to Joffa on the phone and he told me that he would replay the semi if the Exec committee directed him to do so!
Now I have spoken to Alan Cocks 30min ago so if you need any clarification ring him.
St Andrews CC were the first team into this meeting, they made it perfectly clear that they DID NOT want to replay the semi and wanted to stick with the original decision made by the exec committee, which was to play in the GF!
Joffa went into this meeting 2nd and said "We will do what ever the exec committee direct us to do"!
Now because St Andrews already pulled the pin on my proposal, there was no mention of a semi final replay.
This however does not mean Joffa wasn't prepared to replay the semi!!!
So there WAS only one team NOT prepared to replay the semi and that was St Andrews!
I went down to the exec meeting that night and got clarification on what both teams said - by the committee members!
I will stand up infront of every single person involved in this saga and tell them the same thing!
ST ANDREWS WERE THE ONLY TEAM NOT PREPARED TO REPLAY THE SEMI!!!!
Just because Joffa didn't request to replay the semi doesn't mean he was prepared to do it!
I don't care who dug up the pitch mate and I'm not pointing the finger at anyone!
I don't think you should be on this forum either as it is a conflict of interest and so is your brother opening the bat for St Andrews.
Oh Also.....
I don't need to worry about my over rate when my team have bowled out the undeafeted top side in the compition for 108
Mick
I am only going by what Gooky told me mate and as he was in all the meetings and new what was going on I took him on his word. As there were a whole lot of different versions getting thrown around I thought Gooky's version would be alot more relevant than half the crap that has been said on this forum. What you have said above makes alot of sense as well. Also I have been quite open in saying that I felt the Association made the wrong desicion and the games should have been replayed. Just didn't agree with alot of the acusations getting thrown around by a few people from your club and the Roosters.
As for me being an umpire and therefore I should't be commenting on this forum, well sorry mate I think your wrong there. As I said to Nathan Moon on a previous post, when it come to umpiring I will always be impartial, objective and umpire to the laws of cricket. I have umpired St Andrews games before with my brothers playing and I have never favoured them. However when it comes to issues involved with this Association, I will and I am entitled to have my 2 bobs worth like everyone else does.
As for your over rates mate, sorry but not only me, but my fellow umpires and your fellow team mates say you push the boundries when bowling your overs.
Anyway, we've all had our say and there is no hard feelings from my end if there has been any misunderstandings.
Billy Bowden
Member
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Mick
I am only going by what Gooky told me mate and as he was in all the meetings and new what was going on I took him on his word. As there were a whole lot of different versions getting thrown around I thought Gooky's version would be alot more relevant than half the crap that has been said on this forum. What you have said above makes alot of sense as well. Also I have been quite open in saying that I felt the Association made the wrong desicion and the games should have been replayed. Just didn't agree with alot of the acusations getting thrown around by a few people from your club and the Roosters.
As for me being an umpire and therefore I should't be commenting on this forum, well sorry mate I think your wrong there. As I said to Nathan Moon on a previous post, when it come to umpiring I will always be impartial, objective and umpire to the laws of cricket. I have umpired St Andrews games before with my brothers playing and I have never favoured them. However when it comes to issues involved with this Association, I will and I am entitled to have my 2 bobs worth like everyone else does.
As for your over rates mate, sorry but not only me, but my fellow umpires and your fellow team mates say you push the boundries when bowling your overs.
Anyway, we've all had our say and there is no hard feelings from my end if there has been any misunderstandings.
Facts;336998 said:Adam,
This is Mick Callus here champ.
What you need to understand here is that I didn't get anything wrong at all!
I spoke to Joffa on the phone and he told me that he would replay the semi if the Exec committee directed him to do so!
Now I have spoken to Alan Cocks 30min ago so if you need any clarification ring him.
St Andrews CC were the first team into this meeting, they made it perfectly clear that they DID NOT want to replay the semi and wanted to stick with the original decision made by the exec committee, which was to play in the GF!
Joffa went into this meeting 2nd and said "We will do what ever the exec committee direct us to do"!
Now because St Andrews already pulled the pin on my proposal, there was no mention of a semi final replay.
This however does not mean Joffa wasn't prepared to replay the semi!!!
So there WAS only one team NOT prepared to replay the semi and that was St Andrews!
I went down to the exec meeting that night and got clarification on what both teams said - by the committee members!
I will stand up infront of every single person involved in this saga and tell them the same thing!
ST ANDREWS WERE THE ONLY TEAM NOT PREPARED TO REPLAY THE SEMI!!!!
Just because Joffa didn't request to replay the semi doesn't mean he was prepared to do it!
I don't care who dug up the pitch mate and I'm not pointing the finger at anyone!
I don't think you should be on this forum either as it is a conflict of interest and so is your brother opening the bat for St Andrews.
Oh Also.....
I don't need to worry about my over rate when my team have bowled out the undeafeted top side in the compition for 108
Mick
I am only going by what Gooky told me mate and as he was in all the meetings and new what was going on I took him on his word. As there were a whole lot of different versions getting thrown around I thought Gooky's version would be alot more relevant than half the crap that has been said on this forum. What you have said above makes alot of sense as well. Also I have been quite open in saying that I felt the Association made the wrong desicion and the games should have been replayed. Just didn't agree with alot of the acusations getting thrown around by a few people from your club and the Roosters.
As for me being an umpire and therefore I should't be commenting on this forum, well sorry mate I think your wrong there. As I said to Nathan Moon on a previous post, when it come to umpiring I will always be impartial, objective and umpire to the laws of cricket. I have umpired St Andrews games before with my brothers playing and I have never favoured them. However when it comes to issues involved with this Association, I will and I am entitled to have my 2 bobs worth like everyone else does.
As for your over rates mate, sorry but not only me, but my fellow umpires and your fellow team mates say you push the boundries when bowling your overs.
Anyway, we've all had our say and there is no hard feelings from my end if there has been any misunderstandings.
News Breaker
New Member
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Hey Billy Bowden.
Why do umpires want to be involved in all the action always??
You have been involved with all this pitch digging talk on this forum, and talk against St.Andrews, you have been defending St.Andrews.
Which means that you have feelings towards St.Andrews cricket club.
That is what Mick is trying to state that as an umpire you should not even come to the defence of any club as a matter of fact, irrespective of what anybody says on this "Days Of Our Lives Forum"
When you go on defending St.Andrews, or any club, it really discredits your umpiring fraternity.
Now not at any stage am I saying that anybody from St.Andrews is guilty for the pitch digging, so lets clarify that for starters.
Billy as you say you are a turf umpire, why don't you take umpire Eugene under your belt and teach him the proper way to umpire, because from what I have heard and yes have seen, he is not up to any standards to umpire at this present moment, his shocking calling for wides, could have teams erupt into full scale violence.
That is a serious concern, which the Association said they will address, but yes this is true fact, Eugene was promoted to umpire in the "A" Matts semi final, after his very poor umpiring in the last home & away match in "B" Matts.
And last point to ponder for the week
Turf Grand Final could possibly be playing at Spotswoods second turf oval.
Billy Bowden;337048 said:
Hey Billy Bowden.
Why do umpires want to be involved in all the action always??
You have been involved with all this pitch digging talk on this forum, and talk against St.Andrews, you have been defending St.Andrews.
Which means that you have feelings towards St.Andrews cricket club.
That is what Mick is trying to state that as an umpire you should not even come to the defence of any club as a matter of fact, irrespective of what anybody says on this "Days Of Our Lives Forum"
When you go on defending St.Andrews, or any club, it really discredits your umpiring fraternity.
Now not at any stage am I saying that anybody from St.Andrews is guilty for the pitch digging, so lets clarify that for starters.
Billy as you say you are a turf umpire, why don't you take umpire Eugene under your belt and teach him the proper way to umpire, because from what I have heard and yes have seen, he is not up to any standards to umpire at this present moment, his shocking calling for wides, could have teams erupt into full scale violence.
That is a serious concern, which the Association said they will address, but yes this is true fact, Eugene was promoted to umpire in the "A" Matts semi final, after his very poor umpiring in the last home & away match in "B" Matts.
And last point to ponder for the week
Turf Grand Final could possibly be playing at Spotswoods second turf oval.
News Breaker
New Member
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Hey Billy Bowden.
Why do umpires want to be involved in all the action always??
You have been involved with all this pitch digging talk on this forum, and talk against St.Andrews, you have been defending St.Andrews.
Which means that you have feelings towards St.Andrews cricket club.
That is what Mick is trying to state that as an umpire you should not even come to the defence of any club as a matter of fact, irrespective of what anybody says on this "Days Of Our Lives Forum"
When you go on defending St.Andrews, or any club, it really discredits your umpiring fraternity.
Now not at any stage am I saying that anybody from St.Andrews is guilty for the pitch digging, so lets clarify that for starters.
Billy as you say you are a turf umpire, why don't you take umpire Eugene under your belt and teach him the proper way to umpire, because from what I have heard and yes have seen, he is not up to any standards to umpire at this present moment, his shocking calling for wides, could have teams erupt into full scale violence.
That is a serious concern, which the Association said they will address, but yes this is true fact, Eugene was promoted to umpire in the "A" Matts semi final, after his very poor umpiring in the last home & away match in "B" Matts.
And last point to ponder for the week
Turf Grand Final could possibly be playing at Spotswoods second turf oval.
Billy Bowden;337048 said:
Hey Billy Bowden.
Why do umpires want to be involved in all the action always??
You have been involved with all this pitch digging talk on this forum, and talk against St.Andrews, you have been defending St.Andrews.
Which means that you have feelings towards St.Andrews cricket club.
That is what Mick is trying to state that as an umpire you should not even come to the defence of any club as a matter of fact, irrespective of what anybody says on this "Days Of Our Lives Forum"
When you go on defending St.Andrews, or any club, it really discredits your umpiring fraternity.
Now not at any stage am I saying that anybody from St.Andrews is guilty for the pitch digging, so lets clarify that for starters.
Billy as you say you are a turf umpire, why don't you take umpire Eugene under your belt and teach him the proper way to umpire, because from what I have heard and yes have seen, he is not up to any standards to umpire at this present moment, his shocking calling for wides, could have teams erupt into full scale violence.
That is a serious concern, which the Association said they will address, but yes this is true fact, Eugene was promoted to umpire in the "A" Matts semi final, after his very poor umpiring in the last home & away match in "B" Matts.
And last point to ponder for the week
Turf Grand Final could possibly be playing at Spotswoods second turf oval.
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Adam,
What Gooky said was wrong!
What he should have said to you was, Jeff or Melton weren't given the option of replaying the semi final because St Andrews dismissed this option.
People will come to their own conclusions as to what happened mate and I can't stop them, this has affected a lot of people and I never said you agreed or disagreed with the associations decision.
I tried to get a Captains agreement to replay the semi's from scratch - that had NOTHING to do with the association. 3 of the 4 Captains agreed, Pipsak did not agree to replay the semi, that's up to him mate.
I would like to know what you think of that decision mate?
Shaved Plums was also saying on here that St Andrews was given no option to replay the semi that was also incorrect.
St Andrews president also said to me that St Andrews did not make a decision about replaying the semi and told the exec committee to make that decision for them, I soon found out that was incorrect and that St Andrews infact told the exec committee they had no interest in replaying the semi..... Again up to them!!!
Also according to their President, a few of the St Andrews boys couldn't play on the next 2 Sunday's because of work, so I'll be keen to see what side they put on the park to see if that was incorrect as well!!!
BORNTIGERFAN, if you are out there - please come on here and back me up and tell the good people of this forum about our phone call bud!!!
Adam, I have nothing to hide because I've told NO lies!!!!
As for you being on here as an umpire, I too have discussed this with my peers and members of the exec committee and they agree with me that it is a conflict of interest and probably not the most professional approach taken by an official from the comp but again it's only my opinion and you can do what you like....
My over rate has been a problem all year and is something that I address regulary but still disagree with it being displayed on a public forum by an official of the comp. (Pssst - Not very professional...... get it!)
It's funny Adam, Saturday was the first time my over rate has been addressed with me by any umpire this year, Gooky and Forbsey were going to add 5 runs to the score, I suppose I was just lucky we bowled
St Andrews out for such a cheap score with 30 overs to go!!!
Billy Bowden;337048 said:
Adam,
What Gooky said was wrong!
What he should have said to you was, Jeff or Melton weren't given the option of replaying the semi final because St Andrews dismissed this option.
People will come to their own conclusions as to what happened mate and I can't stop them, this has affected a lot of people and I never said you agreed or disagreed with the associations decision.
I tried to get a Captains agreement to replay the semi's from scratch - that had NOTHING to do with the association. 3 of the 4 Captains agreed, Pipsak did not agree to replay the semi, that's up to him mate.
I would like to know what you think of that decision mate?
Shaved Plums was also saying on here that St Andrews was given no option to replay the semi that was also incorrect.
St Andrews president also said to me that St Andrews did not make a decision about replaying the semi and told the exec committee to make that decision for them, I soon found out that was incorrect and that St Andrews infact told the exec committee they had no interest in replaying the semi..... Again up to them!!!
Also according to their President, a few of the St Andrews boys couldn't play on the next 2 Sunday's because of work, so I'll be keen to see what side they put on the park to see if that was incorrect as well!!!
BORNTIGERFAN, if you are out there - please come on here and back me up and tell the good people of this forum about our phone call bud!!!
Adam, I have nothing to hide because I've told NO lies!!!!
As for you being on here as an umpire, I too have discussed this with my peers and members of the exec committee and they agree with me that it is a conflict of interest and probably not the most professional approach taken by an official from the comp but again it's only my opinion and you can do what you like....
My over rate has been a problem all year and is something that I address regulary but still disagree with it being displayed on a public forum by an official of the comp. (Pssst - Not very professional...... get it!)
It's funny Adam, Saturday was the first time my over rate has been addressed with me by any umpire this year, Gooky and Forbsey were going to add 5 runs to the score, I suppose I was just lucky we bowled
St Andrews out for such a cheap score with 30 overs to go!!!
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Adam,
What Gooky said was wrong!
What he should have said to you was, Jeff or Melton weren't given the option of replaying the semi final because St Andrews dismissed this option.
People will come to their own conclusions as to what happened mate and I can't stop them, this has affected a lot of people and I never said you agreed or disagreed with the associations decision.
I tried to get a Captains agreement to replay the semi's from scratch - that had NOTHING to do with the association. 3 of the 4 Captains agreed, Pipsak did not agree to replay the semi, that's up to him mate.
I would like to know what you think of that decision mate?
Shaved Plums was also saying on here that St Andrews was given no option to replay the semi that was also incorrect.
St Andrews president also said to me that St Andrews did not make a decision about replaying the semi and told the exec committee to make that decision for them, I soon found out that was incorrect and that St Andrews infact told the exec committee they had no interest in replaying the semi..... Again up to them!!!
Also according to their President, a few of the St Andrews boys couldn't play on the next 2 Sunday's because of work, so I'll be keen to see what side they put on the park to see if that was incorrect as well!!!
BORNTIGERFAN, if you are out there - please come on here and back me up and tell the good people of this forum about our phone call bud!!!
Adam, I have nothing to hide because I've told NO lies!!!!
As for you being on here as an umpire, I too have discussed this with my peers and members of the exec committee and they agree with me that it is a conflict of interest and probably not the most professional approach taken by an official from the comp but again it's only my opinion and you can do what you like....
My over rate has been a problem all year and is something that I address regulary but still disagree with it being displayed on a public forum by an official of the comp. (Pssst - Not very professional...... get it!)
It's funny Adam, Saturday was the first time my over rate has been addressed with me by any umpire this year, Gooky and Forbsey were going to add 5 runs to the score, I suppose I was just lucky we bowled
St Andrews out for such a cheap score with 30 overs to go!!!
Billy Bowden;337048 said:
Adam,
What Gooky said was wrong!
What he should have said to you was, Jeff or Melton weren't given the option of replaying the semi final because St Andrews dismissed this option.
People will come to their own conclusions as to what happened mate and I can't stop them, this has affected a lot of people and I never said you agreed or disagreed with the associations decision.
I tried to get a Captains agreement to replay the semi's from scratch - that had NOTHING to do with the association. 3 of the 4 Captains agreed, Pipsak did not agree to replay the semi, that's up to him mate.
I would like to know what you think of that decision mate?
Shaved Plums was also saying on here that St Andrews was given no option to replay the semi that was also incorrect.
St Andrews president also said to me that St Andrews did not make a decision about replaying the semi and told the exec committee to make that decision for them, I soon found out that was incorrect and that St Andrews infact told the exec committee they had no interest in replaying the semi..... Again up to them!!!
Also according to their President, a few of the St Andrews boys couldn't play on the next 2 Sunday's because of work, so I'll be keen to see what side they put on the park to see if that was incorrect as well!!!
BORNTIGERFAN, if you are out there - please come on here and back me up and tell the good people of this forum about our phone call bud!!!
Adam, I have nothing to hide because I've told NO lies!!!!
As for you being on here as an umpire, I too have discussed this with my peers and members of the exec committee and they agree with me that it is a conflict of interest and probably not the most professional approach taken by an official from the comp but again it's only my opinion and you can do what you like....
My over rate has been a problem all year and is something that I address regulary but still disagree with it being displayed on a public forum by an official of the comp. (Pssst - Not very professional...... get it!)
It's funny Adam, Saturday was the first time my over rate has been addressed with me by any umpire this year, Gooky and Forbsey were going to add 5 runs to the score, I suppose I was just lucky we bowled
St Andrews out for such a cheap score with 30 overs to go!!!
Shaved_Plums
Member
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Yeah sorry Hack, didn't really mean to infer you were blaming us for anything. Just a bit sick of trying to defend my club, everytime I get on this site! Just a point I'd like to get across to everyone. When the AFL has an issue (like the lights going out at Waverley that time) it's the AFL that decides what happens and NOT the teams. Now I know we are not the AFL - but do you see my point. It doesn't matter what the teams say, it's up to the people running the competition to make the decisions (what ever comp that may be). So in the end the final decision was made by the WSUCCA Commitee memebers not St Andrew's cc. Now if they want to continue to let people blame St Andrew's for this then that's up to them. But at the end of the day they are the ones running this comp, not you or me (or Mick Callus, not even Billy Bowden). Whether that was the right decision or not is another question all together...... But the decision was made by the WSUCCA executive.......... And once again Hack I am sorry if I upset you in any way.
roosters hack;336928 said:Mark...didn't you read my next post? Also i have not blamed St Andrews for anything ......i made myself Quite clear to the executive on Thursday night.......where i layed the blame at the feet of the executive after they failed to act last time this happened, thus opening the door for it to happen again!! LEADERSHIP AND INTEGRITY that's all we are looking for. Thankfully we think we will find those two virtues elsewhere...The Roosters are meeting with the VTCA and the WADCA this week. I hope it rains next weekend and you enjoy an even more hollow premiership..........
Yeah sorry Hack, didn't really mean to infer you were blaming us for anything. Just a bit sick of trying to defend my club, everytime I get on this site! Just a point I'd like to get across to everyone. When the AFL has an issue (like the lights going out at Waverley that time) it's the AFL that decides what happens and NOT the teams. Now I know we are not the AFL - but do you see my point. It doesn't matter what the teams say, it's up to the people running the competition to make the decisions (what ever comp that may be). So in the end the final decision was made by the WSUCCA Commitee memebers not St Andrew's cc. Now if they want to continue to let people blame St Andrew's for this then that's up to them. But at the end of the day they are the ones running this comp, not you or me (or Mick Callus, not even Billy Bowden). Whether that was the right decision or not is another question all together...... But the decision was made by the WSUCCA executive.......... And once again Hack I am sorry if I upset you in any way.
Shaved_Plums
Member
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Yeah sorry Hack, didn't really mean to infer you were blaming us for anything. Just a bit sick of trying to defend my club, everytime I get on this site! Just a point I'd like to get across to everyone. When the AFL has an issue (like the lights going out at Waverley that time) it's the AFL that decides what happens and NOT the teams. Now I know we are not the AFL - but do you see my point. It doesn't matter what the teams say, it's up to the people running the competition to make the decisions (what ever comp that may be). So in the end the final decision was made by the WSUCCA Commitee memebers not St Andrew's cc. Now if they want to continue to let people blame St Andrew's for this then that's up to them. But at the end of the day they are the ones running this comp, not you or me (or Mick Callus, not even Billy Bowden). Whether that was the right decision or not is another question all together...... But the decision was made by the WSUCCA executive.......... And once again Hack I am sorry if I upset you in any way.
roosters hack;336928 said:Mark...didn't you read my next post? Also i have not blamed St Andrews for anything ......i made myself Quite clear to the executive on Thursday night.......where i layed the blame at the feet of the executive after they failed to act last time this happened, thus opening the door for it to happen again!! LEADERSHIP AND INTEGRITY that's all we are looking for. Thankfully we think we will find those two virtues elsewhere...The Roosters are meeting with the VTCA and the WADCA this week. I hope it rains next weekend and you enjoy an even more hollow premiership..........
Yeah sorry Hack, didn't really mean to infer you were blaming us for anything. Just a bit sick of trying to defend my club, everytime I get on this site! Just a point I'd like to get across to everyone. When the AFL has an issue (like the lights going out at Waverley that time) it's the AFL that decides what happens and NOT the teams. Now I know we are not the AFL - but do you see my point. It doesn't matter what the teams say, it's up to the people running the competition to make the decisions (what ever comp that may be). So in the end the final decision was made by the WSUCCA Commitee memebers not St Andrew's cc. Now if they want to continue to let people blame St Andrew's for this then that's up to them. But at the end of the day they are the ones running this comp, not you or me (or Mick Callus, not even Billy Bowden). Whether that was the right decision or not is another question all together...... But the decision was made by the WSUCCA executive.......... And once again Hack I am sorry if I upset you in any way.
Billy Bowden
Member
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Mr News Breaker
Yes I am an umpire, but having an opinion on the turf issue does not impact on my or my fellow umpries ability one bit. If I was a commitee memeber or a member at St Andrews then yes there would be a conflict but I am not, so I feel I can have an opinion. I am a big supporter of this Association and understand the tireless hours club committee members put into their clubs so therefore I believe I can defend clubs of wrong doing if it is warrented. Yes my brothers play at St Andrews but that hasn't influenced my opinion 1 bit. Whether I am an umpire, player or club supporter if people want to point fingers without proof then I feel i can have an opinion like everyone else and defend clubs. Yes I have defended St Andrews from being accused of the pitch digging as there is no proof but I was also dissapointed they couldn't agree to replay semi final as well. (Refer to Post # 1553 on Page 156). So News Breaker I will continue to give my opinion on all issues regarding this asscoiation whether you like it or not.
As for Eugene, well totally agree with you and I think its time he was given the tijuana brass.
News Breaker;337071 said:
Mr News Breaker
Yes I am an umpire, but having an opinion on the turf issue does not impact on my or my fellow umpries ability one bit. If I was a commitee memeber or a member at St Andrews then yes there would be a conflict but I am not, so I feel I can have an opinion. I am a big supporter of this Association and understand the tireless hours club committee members put into their clubs so therefore I believe I can defend clubs of wrong doing if it is warrented. Yes my brothers play at St Andrews but that hasn't influenced my opinion 1 bit. Whether I am an umpire, player or club supporter if people want to point fingers without proof then I feel i can have an opinion like everyone else and defend clubs. Yes I have defended St Andrews from being accused of the pitch digging as there is no proof but I was also dissapointed they couldn't agree to replay semi final as well. (Refer to Post # 1553 on Page 156). So News Breaker I will continue to give my opinion on all issues regarding this asscoiation whether you like it or not.
As for Eugene, well totally agree with you and I think its time he was given the tijuana brass.
Billy Bowden
Member
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Mr News Breaker
Yes I am an umpire, but having an opinion on the turf issue does not impact on my or my fellow umpries ability one bit. If I was a commitee memeber or a member at St Andrews then yes there would be a conflict but I am not, so I feel I can have an opinion. I am a big supporter of this Association and understand the tireless hours club committee members put into their clubs so therefore I believe I can defend clubs of wrong doing if it is warrented. Yes my brothers play at St Andrews but that hasn't influenced my opinion 1 bit. Whether I am an umpire, player or club supporter if people want to point fingers without proof then I feel i can have an opinion like everyone else and defend clubs. Yes I have defended St Andrews from being accused of the pitch digging as there is no proof but I was also dissapointed they couldn't agree to replay semi final as well. (Refer to Post # 1553 on Page 156). So News Breaker I will continue to give my opinion on all issues regarding this asscoiation whether you like it or not.
As for Eugene, well totally agree with you and I think its time he was given the tijuana brass.
News Breaker;337071 said:
Mr News Breaker
Yes I am an umpire, but having an opinion on the turf issue does not impact on my or my fellow umpries ability one bit. If I was a commitee memeber or a member at St Andrews then yes there would be a conflict but I am not, so I feel I can have an opinion. I am a big supporter of this Association and understand the tireless hours club committee members put into their clubs so therefore I believe I can defend clubs of wrong doing if it is warrented. Yes my brothers play at St Andrews but that hasn't influenced my opinion 1 bit. Whether I am an umpire, player or club supporter if people want to point fingers without proof then I feel i can have an opinion like everyone else and defend clubs. Yes I have defended St Andrews from being accused of the pitch digging as there is no proof but I was also dissapointed they couldn't agree to replay semi final as well. (Refer to Post # 1553 on Page 156). So News Breaker I will continue to give my opinion on all issues regarding this asscoiation whether you like it or not.
As for Eugene, well totally agree with you and I think its time he was given the tijuana brass.
NEED FOR SPEED
New Member
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Yeh well said Billy.
You don't talk dribble like above post #1641 but you seem to be up there in the now of whats going on around the place and this sure beats listening to outdated or incorrect information. (spottswood ground?? is this another stab)
Keep it up,everyone entitled to an opinion.
Eugene did get the tijuana brass from the G.F'S
Billy Bowden;337169 said:
Yeh well said Billy.
You don't talk dribble like above post #1641 but you seem to be up there in the now of whats going on around the place and this sure beats listening to outdated or incorrect information. (spottswood ground?? is this another stab)
Keep it up,everyone entitled to an opinion.
Eugene did get the tijuana brass from the G.F'S
NEED FOR SPEED
New Member
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Yeh well said Billy.
You don't talk dribble like above post #1641 but you seem to be up there in the now of whats going on around the place and this sure beats listening to outdated or incorrect information. (spottswood ground?? is this another stab)
Keep it up,everyone entitled to an opinion.
Eugene did get the tijuana brass from the G.F'S
Billy Bowden;337169 said:
Yeh well said Billy.
You don't talk dribble like above post #1641 but you seem to be up there in the now of whats going on around the place and this sure beats listening to outdated or incorrect information. (spottswood ground?? is this another stab)
Keep it up,everyone entitled to an opinion.
Eugene did get the tijuana brass from the G.F'S
Billy Bowden
Member
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Mick
In regards to what I think of St Andrews decision not wanting to replay the final I have always said I was dissapointed by their decision, but as a club they are entitled to make that decision. Have a read of Post # 1553 on Page 156 as I have given a detailed opinion of what I felt.
As regards to me giving opinions on this forum, I too have spoken to players from your club and other clubs as well as association committee members and they don't have a problem as long as I don't get personal and it compromises my umpiring. I don't believe I have been personal or any of my opinions have influenced any games this year. Mate if I have a disagreement with you in no way shape or form will I use that against you or your club when umpiring your games or any other clubs matches.
As for the over rate issue, the original post I put on was only ment to be a light harted comment that was never ment to be offensive. I appologise if it did offended you. I probably should have spoken to you privately about it.
Facts;337080 said:Adam,
What Gooky said was wrong!
What he should have said to you was, Jeff or Melton weren't given the option of replaying the semi final because St Andrews dismissed this option.
People will come to their own conclusions as to what happened mate and I can't stop them, this has affected a lot of people and I never said you agreed or disagreed with the associations decision.
I tried to get a Captains agreement to replay the semi's from scratch - that had NOTHING to do with the association. 3 of the 4 Captains agreed, Pipsak did not agree to replay the semi, that's up to him mate.
I would like to know what you think of that decision mate?
As for you being on here as an umpire, I too have discussed this with my peers and members of the exec committee and they agree with me that it is a conflict of interest and probably not the most professional approach taken by an official from the comp but again it's only my opinion and you can do what you like....
My over rate has been a problem all year and is something that I address regulary but still disagree with it being displayed on a public forum by an official of the comp. (Pssst - Not very professional...... get it!)
It's funny Adam, Saturday was the first time my over rate has been addressed with me by any umpire this year, Gooky and Forbsey were going to add 5 runs to the score, I suppose I was just lucky we bowled
St Andrews out for such a cheap score with 30 overs to go!!!
Mick
In regards to what I think of St Andrews decision not wanting to replay the final I have always said I was dissapointed by their decision, but as a club they are entitled to make that decision. Have a read of Post # 1553 on Page 156 as I have given a detailed opinion of what I felt.
As regards to me giving opinions on this forum, I too have spoken to players from your club and other clubs as well as association committee members and they don't have a problem as long as I don't get personal and it compromises my umpiring. I don't believe I have been personal or any of my opinions have influenced any games this year. Mate if I have a disagreement with you in no way shape or form will I use that against you or your club when umpiring your games or any other clubs matches.
As for the over rate issue, the original post I put on was only ment to be a light harted comment that was never ment to be offensive. I appologise if it did offended you. I probably should have spoken to you privately about it.
Billy Bowden
Member
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Mick
In regards to what I think of St Andrews decision not wanting to replay the final I have always said I was dissapointed by their decision, but as a club they are entitled to make that decision. Have a read of Post # 1553 on Page 156 as I have given a detailed opinion of what I felt.
As regards to me giving opinions on this forum, I too have spoken to players from your club and other clubs as well as association committee members and they don't have a problem as long as I don't get personal and it compromises my umpiring. I don't believe I have been personal or any of my opinions have influenced any games this year. Mate if I have a disagreement with you in no way shape or form will I use that against you or your club when umpiring your games or any other clubs matches.
As for the over rate issue, the original post I put on was only ment to be a light harted comment that was never ment to be offensive. I appologise if it did offended you. I probably should have spoken to you privately about it.
Facts;337080 said:Adam,
What Gooky said was wrong!
What he should have said to you was, Jeff or Melton weren't given the option of replaying the semi final because St Andrews dismissed this option.
People will come to their own conclusions as to what happened mate and I can't stop them, this has affected a lot of people and I never said you agreed or disagreed with the associations decision.
I tried to get a Captains agreement to replay the semi's from scratch - that had NOTHING to do with the association. 3 of the 4 Captains agreed, Pipsak did not agree to replay the semi, that's up to him mate.
I would like to know what you think of that decision mate?
As for you being on here as an umpire, I too have discussed this with my peers and members of the exec committee and they agree with me that it is a conflict of interest and probably not the most professional approach taken by an official from the comp but again it's only my opinion and you can do what you like....
My over rate has been a problem all year and is something that I address regulary but still disagree with it being displayed on a public forum by an official of the comp. (Pssst - Not very professional...... get it!)
It's funny Adam, Saturday was the first time my over rate has been addressed with me by any umpire this year, Gooky and Forbsey were going to add 5 runs to the score, I suppose I was just lucky we bowled
St Andrews out for such a cheap score with 30 overs to go!!!
Mick
In regards to what I think of St Andrews decision not wanting to replay the final I have always said I was dissapointed by their decision, but as a club they are entitled to make that decision. Have a read of Post # 1553 on Page 156 as I have given a detailed opinion of what I felt.
As regards to me giving opinions on this forum, I too have spoken to players from your club and other clubs as well as association committee members and they don't have a problem as long as I don't get personal and it compromises my umpiring. I don't believe I have been personal or any of my opinions have influenced any games this year. Mate if I have a disagreement with you in no way shape or form will I use that against you or your club when umpiring your games or any other clubs matches.
As for the over rate issue, the original post I put on was only ment to be a light harted comment that was never ment to be offensive. I appologise if it did offended you. I probably should have spoken to you privately about it.
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Hey Mick get your head out of your ass will you.
It is the association job to make the dcision not the clubs. What Gooky has stated is exactly what has been told to a number of people therefore if you are saying that it is not true is Gooky a liar is that what you are saying?
Also have a listen to yourself will you i quote "I too have discussed this with my peers and members of the exec committee and they agree with me that it is a conflict of interest" who died and made you in charge of the comp? this is a public forum and anyone is allowed to say what they want on this no matter ther position mate.
I will agree with you on one thing though it is not your over rate you need to work on more your running between wickets Mick. Remember the Semi Mick when you burnt two of your batting partners by not taking the easy single so you didnt have to face draper the next over? now there the facts.
Facts;337080 said:Adam,
What Gooky said was wrong!
What he should have said to you was, Jeff or Melton weren't given the option of replaying the semi final because St Andrews dismissed this option.
People will come to their own conclusions as to what happened mate and I can't stop them, this has affected a lot of people and I never said you agreed or disagreed with the associations decision.
I tried to get a Captains agreement to replay the semi's from scratch - that had NOTHING to do with the association. 3 of the 4 Captains agreed, Pipsak did not agree to replay the semi, that's up to him mate.
I would like to know what you think of that decision mate?
Shaved Plums was also saying on here that St Andrews was given no option to replay the semi that was also incorrect.
St Andrews president also said to me that St Andrews did not make a decision about replaying the semi and told the exec committee to make that decision for them, I soon found out that was incorrect and that St Andrews infact told the exec committee they had no interest in replaying the semi..... Again up to them!!!
Also according to their President, a few of the St Andrews boys couldn't play on the next 2 Sunday's because of work, so I'll be keen to see what side they put on the park to see if that was incorrect as well!!!
BORNTIGERFAN, if you are out there - please come on here and back me up and tell the good people of this forum about our phone call bud!!!
Adam, I have nothing to hide because I've told NO lies!!!!
As for you being on here as an umpire, I too have discussed this with my peers and members of the exec committee and they agree with me that it is a conflict of interest and probably not the most professional approach taken by an official from the comp but again it's only my opinion and you can do what you like....
My over rate has been a problem all year and is something that I address regulary but still disagree with it being displayed on a public forum by an official of the comp. (Pssst - Not very professional...... get it!)
It's funny Adam, Saturday was the first time my over rate has been addressed with me by any umpire this year, Gooky and Forbsey were going to add 5 runs to the score, I suppose I was just lucky we bowled
St Andrews out for such a cheap score with 30 overs to go!!!
Hey Mick get your head out of your ass will you.
It is the association job to make the dcision not the clubs. What Gooky has stated is exactly what has been told to a number of people therefore if you are saying that it is not true is Gooky a liar is that what you are saying?
Also have a listen to yourself will you i quote "I too have discussed this with my peers and members of the exec committee and they agree with me that it is a conflict of interest" who died and made you in charge of the comp? this is a public forum and anyone is allowed to say what they want on this no matter ther position mate.
I will agree with you on one thing though it is not your over rate you need to work on more your running between wickets Mick. Remember the Semi Mick when you burnt two of your batting partners by not taking the easy single so you didnt have to face draper the next over? now there the facts.
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Hey Mick get your head out of your ass will you.
It is the association job to make the dcision not the clubs. What Gooky has stated is exactly what has been told to a number of people therefore if you are saying that it is not true is Gooky a liar is that what you are saying?
Also have a listen to yourself will you i quote "I too have discussed this with my peers and members of the exec committee and they agree with me that it is a conflict of interest" who died and made you in charge of the comp? this is a public forum and anyone is allowed to say what they want on this no matter ther position mate.
I will agree with you on one thing though it is not your over rate you need to work on more your running between wickets Mick. Remember the Semi Mick when you burnt two of your batting partners by not taking the easy single so you didnt have to face draper the next over? now there the facts.
Facts;337080 said:Adam,
What Gooky said was wrong!
What he should have said to you was, Jeff or Melton weren't given the option of replaying the semi final because St Andrews dismissed this option.
People will come to their own conclusions as to what happened mate and I can't stop them, this has affected a lot of people and I never said you agreed or disagreed with the associations decision.
I tried to get a Captains agreement to replay the semi's from scratch - that had NOTHING to do with the association. 3 of the 4 Captains agreed, Pipsak did not agree to replay the semi, that's up to him mate.
I would like to know what you think of that decision mate?
Shaved Plums was also saying on here that St Andrews was given no option to replay the semi that was also incorrect.
St Andrews president also said to me that St Andrews did not make a decision about replaying the semi and told the exec committee to make that decision for them, I soon found out that was incorrect and that St Andrews infact told the exec committee they had no interest in replaying the semi..... Again up to them!!!
Also according to their President, a few of the St Andrews boys couldn't play on the next 2 Sunday's because of work, so I'll be keen to see what side they put on the park to see if that was incorrect as well!!!
BORNTIGERFAN, if you are out there - please come on here and back me up and tell the good people of this forum about our phone call bud!!!
Adam, I have nothing to hide because I've told NO lies!!!!
As for you being on here as an umpire, I too have discussed this with my peers and members of the exec committee and they agree with me that it is a conflict of interest and probably not the most professional approach taken by an official from the comp but again it's only my opinion and you can do what you like....
My over rate has been a problem all year and is something that I address regulary but still disagree with it being displayed on a public forum by an official of the comp. (Pssst - Not very professional...... get it!)
It's funny Adam, Saturday was the first time my over rate has been addressed with me by any umpire this year, Gooky and Forbsey were going to add 5 runs to the score, I suppose I was just lucky we bowled
St Andrews out for such a cheap score with 30 overs to go!!!
Hey Mick get your head out of your ass will you.
It is the association job to make the dcision not the clubs. What Gooky has stated is exactly what has been told to a number of people therefore if you are saying that it is not true is Gooky a liar is that what you are saying?
Also have a listen to yourself will you i quote "I too have discussed this with my peers and members of the exec committee and they agree with me that it is a conflict of interest" who died and made you in charge of the comp? this is a public forum and anyone is allowed to say what they want on this no matter ther position mate.
I will agree with you on one thing though it is not your over rate you need to work on more your running between wickets Mick. Remember the Semi Mick when you burnt two of your batting partners by not taking the easy single so you didnt have to face draper the next over? now there the facts.
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Here we go.......
Looks like someone has taken their HERO pills this morning!
Mate if you're going to have a go at me about what I post on here, how about you tell me your name, so I know who I'm dealing with ****er
cash game;337203 said:
Here we go.......
Looks like someone has taken their HERO pills this morning!
Mate if you're going to have a go at me about what I post on here, how about you tell me your name, so I know who I'm dealing with ****er
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Here we go.......
Looks like someone has taken their HERO pills this morning!
Mate if you're going to have a go at me about what I post on here, how about you tell me your name, so I know who I'm dealing with ****er
cash game;337203 said:
Here we go.......
Looks like someone has taken their HERO pills this morning!
Mate if you're going to have a go at me about what I post on here, how about you tell me your name, so I know who I'm dealing with ****er
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
As regards to me giving opinions on this forum, I too have spoken to players from your club and other clubs as well as association committee members and they don't have a problem as long as I don't get personal and it compromises my umpiring. I don't believe I have been personal or any of my opinions have influenced any games this year. Mate if I have a disagreement with you in no way shape or form will I use that against you or your club when umpiring your games or any other clubs matches.
Totally up to you, I'm just giving you my opinion mate.
Billy Bowden;337182 said:
As regards to me giving opinions on this forum, I too have spoken to players from your club and other clubs as well as association committee members and they don't have a problem as long as I don't get personal and it compromises my umpiring. I don't believe I have been personal or any of my opinions have influenced any games this year. Mate if I have a disagreement with you in no way shape or form will I use that against you or your club when umpiring your games or any other clubs matches.
Totally up to you, I'm just giving you my opinion mate.
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
As regards to me giving opinions on this forum, I too have spoken to players from your club and other clubs as well as association committee members and they don't have a problem as long as I don't get personal and it compromises my umpiring. I don't believe I have been personal or any of my opinions have influenced any games this year. Mate if I have a disagreement with you in no way shape or form will I use that against you or your club when umpiring your games or any other clubs matches.
Totally up to you, I'm just giving you my opinion mate.
Billy Bowden;337182 said:
As regards to me giving opinions on this forum, I too have spoken to players from your club and other clubs as well as association committee members and they don't have a problem as long as I don't get personal and it compromises my umpiring. I don't believe I have been personal or any of my opinions have influenced any games this year. Mate if I have a disagreement with you in no way shape or form will I use that against you or your club when umpiring your games or any other clubs matches.
Totally up to you, I'm just giving you my opinion mate.
News Breaker
New Member
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Need for Speed it looks like you have a grudge or beef against whatever I say on here.
What is your problem???
I have never said anything against you, or bad against you or anybody as a matter of fact.
So you boofhead I am sick of your comments against me with no substance you hero.
I don't take a stab at any kind of information, I report it as it lands onto my desk. If the information I receive is wrong, I will be the first to say I was wrong.
But until I have personally slagged you or put you down, my advice to you is shut your gob, and dont get involved.
If you have a gripe against me come out into the open and state what it is.
NEED FOR SPEED;337176 said:Yeh well said Billy.
You don't talk dribble like above post #1641 but you seem to be up there in the now of whats going on around the place and this sure beats listening to outdated or incorrect information. (spottswood ground?? is this another stab)
Keep it up,everyone entitled to an opinion.
Eugene did get the tijuana brass from the G.F'S
Need for Speed it looks like you have a grudge or beef against whatever I say on here.
What is your problem???
I have never said anything against you, or bad against you or anybody as a matter of fact.
So you boofhead I am sick of your comments against me with no substance you hero.
I don't take a stab at any kind of information, I report it as it lands onto my desk. If the information I receive is wrong, I will be the first to say I was wrong.
But until I have personally slagged you or put you down, my advice to you is shut your gob, and dont get involved.
If you have a gripe against me come out into the open and state what it is.
News Breaker
New Member
Re: Western Suburbs Churches Cricket Association
Need for Speed it looks like you have a grudge or beef against whatever I say on here.
What is your problem???
I have never said anything against you, or bad against you or anybody as a matter of fact.
So you boofhead I am sick of your comments against me with no substance you hero.
I don't take a stab at any kind of information, I report it as it lands onto my desk. If the information I receive is wrong, I will be the first to say I was wrong.
But until I have personally slagged you or put you down, my advice to you is shut your gob, and dont get involved.
If you have a gripe against me come out into the open and state what it is.
NEED FOR SPEED;337176 said:Yeh well said Billy.
You don't talk dribble like above post #1641 but you seem to be up there in the now of whats going on around the place and this sure beats listening to outdated or incorrect information. (spottswood ground?? is this another stab)
Keep it up,everyone entitled to an opinion.
Eugene did get the tijuana brass from the G.F'S
Need for Speed it looks like you have a grudge or beef against whatever I say on here.
What is your problem???
I have never said anything against you, or bad against you or anybody as a matter of fact.
So you boofhead I am sick of your comments against me with no substance you hero.
I don't take a stab at any kind of information, I report it as it lands onto my desk. If the information I receive is wrong, I will be the first to say I was wrong.
But until I have personally slagged you or put you down, my advice to you is shut your gob, and dont get involved.
If you have a gripe against me come out into the open and state what it is.
- Status