macca
Active Member
I ran into some dead ends that would take to much time and trouble but i will try and find the last draft which was the best.
I thought about the slider backspinner too. Doug Ring bowled it and bradman saw him bowl plenty but ring might not have perfected it till early 1950,s after bradman left team.
But back to bradman in his opus on cricket ''art of cricket" in the chapter on spin bowling he describes legspin, offspin and topspin and their effect on drift and turn etc but then goes on to say there is no point even considering backspin for the spin bowler because it would be impossible to apply enough to effect the ball ,unlike golf etc.
Now we know that aint so, but i couldn't find anyone else in print or web who has noticed this mistake in bradmans book. Even through all the reprints and revisions that were done on the book it still remains in the books latest edition.
I thought about the slider backspinner too. Doug Ring bowled it and bradman saw him bowl plenty but ring might not have perfected it till early 1950,s after bradman left team.
But back to bradman in his opus on cricket ''art of cricket" in the chapter on spin bowling he describes legspin, offspin and topspin and their effect on drift and turn etc but then goes on to say there is no point even considering backspin for the spin bowler because it would be impossible to apply enough to effect the ball ,unlike golf etc.
Now we know that aint so, but i couldn't find anyone else in print or web who has noticed this mistake in bradmans book. Even through all the reprints and revisions that were done on the book it still remains in the books latest edition.