mmvca

[son of milky bill]

Re: mmvca

Sad to hear our 2's didn't make it,but in a negative there is always a positive and it know gives us an oppurtunity to stack our 1sts leading into the finals.

All says for a good finals series and congradulations to all that made it and best wishes to all concerned in the finals(a little tongue in cheek)

Great finals atmosphere at Brierley on Saturday with the result going down to the wire with so many senario's in the making till the final result.

My tips for the semi's

Hopefully the Saints will be with us !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

As a socials player I hope you do stack your 1s full of 2s players.

 

[Old School]

Re: mmvca

The rule for runners and substitute fielders are as follows

1. Substitutes and runners
(a) If the umpires are satisfied that a player has been injured or become ill after the nomination of the players, they shall allow that player to have
(i) a substitute acting instead of him in the field.
(ii) a runner when batting.
Any injury or illness that occurs at any time after the nomination of the players until the conclusion of the match shall be allowable, irrespective of whether play is in progress or not.


So by the sounds of that St Andrews nor any other club would not be able to use a sub fielder if it is known that a player has taken in a injury into the game. However at this level its a pretty hard thing to enforce.... How does the umpires on the day know that a player has taken an injury into the game? Unless of course say for example Nevelle Taylor didn't field the week before and Umpire A was umpiring when Nevelle didn't field due to an injury sustained in that game and Umpire A is also umpiring the following week when the same occures. I dont think the Umpires can take here say on these matters, even then its still going to be pretty hard to prove that he wasn't 100% fit going into the game? I think the runner thing will be hard to get for Saint Andrews but not allowing a fielder will be a little more diffiult even though they are undfer the same rule.

By the way the rule stated above also moves on to say....

(b) The umpires shall have discretion, for other wholly acceptable reasons, to allow a substitute for a fielder, or a runner for a batsman, at the start of the match or at any subsequent time.

So reading into that if the umpires let him have a fielder field for him they probably couldn't say no to a runner as its the same rule.

Anyway.... In my opinion Nifty will play. He loves the club to much and playing cricket to much to not play. He is not the youngest player in the club and there wont be to many more chances for him to play in Grand Finals so he will give it everything he has got. Plus I think the club will want and need him to play because the depth in batting in there 2's is not that great. The possible players who would replace him are Ryan Doidge (even Ryano would admit he has had a shocker of a year!), Micky Hamilton (averages 9 with the bat for the club) or most likely the in form 2's batsmen Georgey Salenro (around 350 runs for the season at about 40).

Even though I'm obviously a little biased I think if St Andrews fire they will be the team to beat without doubt.

What about the Wernham's? Scott was opening the bat at the start of the year.

 

[son of milky bill]

Re: mmvca

Thats whom i was talking about. St Andrews beat St Marys outright, from my understanding socials lost to them. Not sure what their on about

Socials defeated St mary's in Round 2 convincingly only losing late wickets 2 or 3 in the last 5 runs to make the st mary's defeat credible. This was the first game of the season as round 1 was R/S. A lot has happened since then and St Mary's would have grown in confidence since then will be 2 completely different teams as Socials have 3 or 4 different players and st mary's are more confident in their ability. Although that being said neither team is i the grand final yet and are both a long way from that game

 

[Hirdy05_]

Re: mmvca

Socials defeated St mary's in Round 2 convincingly only losing late wickets 2 or 3 in the last 5 runs to make the st mary's defeat credible. This was the first game of the season as round 1 was R/S. A lot has happened since then and St Mary's would have grown in confidence since then will be 2 completely different teams as Socials have 3 or 4 different players and st mary's are more confident in their ability. Although that being said neither team is i the grand final yet and are both a long way from that game

I'm pretty sure this time he was talking about St Andrews giving The Socials a smacking, which I believe they did.

 

[upthesaints]

Re: mmvca

Thats a very good point. Does anyone know the rule in relation to having a runner for an injury sustained in previous weeks. as far as I am aware the batter must run for himself if it is an injury carried into the game which it will be. If thats the rule then the socials would be stupid to let the guy bat with a runner and as a socials player it wont be happening.

Not sure how it works with sub fielders either. Please inform me as to the rule if you know it

The rule for runners and substitute fielders are as follows

1. Substitutes and runners
(a) If the umpires are satisfied that a player has been injured or become ill after the nomination of the players, they shall allow that player to have
(i) a substitute acting instead of him in the field.
(ii) a runner when batting.
Any injury or illness that occurs at any time after the nomination of the players until the conclusion of the match shall be allowable, irrespective of whether play is in progress or not.


So by the sounds of that St Andrews nor any other club would not be able to use a sub fielder if it is known that a player has taken in a injury into the game. However at this level its a pretty hard thing to enforce.... How does the umpires on the day know that a player has taken an injury into the game? Unless of course say for example Nevelle Taylor didn't field the week before and Umpire A was umpiring when Nevelle didn't field due to an injury sustained in that game and Umpire A is also umpiring the following week when the same occures. I dont think the Umpires can take here say on these matters, even then its still going to be pretty hard to prove that he wasn't 100% fit going into the game? I think the runner thing will be hard to get for Saint Andrews but not allowing a fielder will be a little more diffiult even though they are undfer the same rule.

By the way the rule stated above also moves on to say....

(b) The umpires shall have discretion, for other wholly acceptable reasons, to allow a substitute for a fielder, or a runner for a batsman, at the start of the match or at any subsequent time.

So reading into that if the umpires let him have a fielder field for him they probably couldn't say no to a runner as its the same rule.

Anyway.... In my opinion Nifty will play. He loves the club to much and playing cricket to much to not play. He is not the youngest player in the club and there wont be to many more chances for him to play in Grand Finals so he will give it everything he has got. Plus I think the club will want and need him to play because the depth in batting in there 2's is not that great. The possible players who would replace him are Ryan Doidge (even Ryano would admit he has had a shocker of a year!), Micky Hamilton (averages 9 with the bat for the club) or most likely the in form 2's batsmen Georgey Salenro (around 350 runs for the season at about 40).

Even though I'm obviously a little biased I think if St Andrews fire they will be the team to beat without doubt.

 

[wetdeck]

Re: mmvca

The rule for runners and substitute fielders are as follows

1. Substitutes and runners
(a) If the umpires are satisfied that a player has been injured or become ill after the nomination of the players, they shall allow that player to have
(i) a substitute acting instead of him in the field.
(ii) a runner when batting.
Any injury or illness that occurs at any time after the nomination of the players until the conclusion of the match shall be allowable, irrespective of whether play is in progress or not.


So by the sounds of that St Andrews nor any other club would not be able to use a sub fielder if it is known that a player has taken in a injury into the game. However at this level its a pretty hard thing to enforce.... How does the umpires on the day know that a player has taken an injury into the game? Unless of course say for example Nevelle Taylor didn't field the week before and Umpire A was umpiring when Nevelle didn't field due to an injury sustained in that game and Umpire A is also umpiring the following week when the same occures. I dont think the Umpires can take here say on these matters, even then its still going to be pretty hard to prove that he wasn't 100% fit going into the game? I think the runner thing will be hard to get for Saint Andrews but not allowing a fielder will be a little more diffiult even though they are undfer the same rule.

By the way the rule stated above also moves on to say....

(b) The umpires shall have discretion, for other wholly acceptable reasons, to allow a substitute for a fielder, or a runner for a batsman, at the start of the match or at any subsequent time.

So reading into that if the umpires let him have a fielder field for him they probably couldn't say no to a runner as its the same rule.

Anyway.... In my opinion Nifty will play. He loves the club to much and playing cricket to much to not play. He is not the youngest player in the club and there wont be to many more chances for him to play in Grand Finals so he will give it everything he has got. Plus I think the club will want and need him to play because the depth in batting in there 2's is not that great. The possible players who would replace him are Ryan Doidge (even Ryano would admit he has had a shocker of a year!), Micky Hamilton (averages 9 with the bat for the club) or most likely the in form 2's batsmen Georgey Salenro (around 350 runs for the season at about 40).

Even though I'm obviously a little biased I think if St Andrews fire they will be the team to beat without doubt.

nev is definitely playing... that is a fact.

it will be interesting to see wether he can bat well with a serious injury though... apparently he is in a fair bit of pain

 

[Old School]

Re: mmvca

The rule for runners and substitute fielders are as follows

1. Substitutes and runners
(a) If the umpires are satisfied that a player has been injured or become ill after the nomination of the players, they shall allow that player to have
(i) a substitute acting instead of him in the field.
(ii) a runner when batting.
Any injury or illness that occurs at any time after the nomination of the players until the conclusion of the match shall be allowable, irrespective of whether play is in progress or not.


So by the sounds of that St Andrews nor any other club would not be able to use a sub fielder if it is known that a player has taken in a injury into the game. However at this level its a pretty hard thing to enforce.... How does the umpires on the day know that a player has taken an injury into the game? Unless of course say for example Nevelle Taylor didn't field the week before and Umpire A was umpiring when Nevelle didn't field due to an injury sustained in that game and Umpire A is also umpiring the following week when the same occures. I dont think the Umpires can take here say on these matters, even then its still going to be pretty hard to prove that he wasn't 100% fit going into the game? I think the runner thing will be hard to get for Saint Andrews but not allowing a fielder will be a little more diffiult even though they are undfer the same rule.

By the way the rule stated above also moves on to say....

(b) The umpires shall have discretion, for other wholly acceptable reasons, to allow a substitute for a fielder, or a runner for a batsman, at the start of the match or at any subsequent time.

So reading into that if the umpires let him have a fielder field for him they probably couldn't say no to a runner as its the same rule.

Anyway.... In my opinion Nifty will play. He loves the club to much and playing cricket to much to not play. He is not the youngest player in the club and there wont be to many more chances for him to play in Grand Finals so he will give it everything he has got. Plus I think the club will want and need him to play because the depth in batting in there 2's is not that great. The possible players who would replace him are Ryan Doidge (even Ryano would admit he has had a shocker of a year!), Micky Hamilton (averages 9 with the bat for the club) or most likely the in form 2's batsmen Georgey Salenro (around 350 runs for the season at about 40).

Even though I'm obviously a little biased I think if St Andrews fire they will be the team to beat without doubt.

What about the Wernham's? Scott was opening the bat at the start of the year.

 

[F.O.S]

Re: mmvca

nev is definitely playing... that is a fact.

it will be interesting to see wether he can bat well with a serious injury though... apparently he is in a fair bit of pain

Time to start concentrating on the job at hand,good to get everyone thinking about our boys,all comments are a little tongue in cheek and interesting to see the reaction from certain areas,makes for good reading leading up to the finals this weekend.

We can wheel Nev out let him bat and then wheel him back if that's okay by all.(check that rule please)

Certainly would be good value even then,i am sure !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

In regards to the comment of stacking the 1's,whoever is in the side is an integral part of what the club is about and i am sure will produce when their turn comes around.

Rumour is that a certain old bloke(not to be named)could be an integral player in the lower grades(was a gun,just ask him) definately an old bull.

 

[Hirdy05_]

Re: mmvca

Socials defeated St mary's in Round 2 convincingly only losing late wickets 2 or 3 in the last 5 runs to make the st mary's defeat credible. This was the first game of the season as round 1 was R/S. A lot has happened since then and St Mary's would have grown in confidence since then will be 2 completely different teams as Socials have 3 or 4 different players and st mary's are more confident in their ability. Although that being said neither team is i the grand final yet and are both a long way from that game

I'm pretty sure this time he was talking about St Andrews giving The Socials a smacking, which I believe they did.

 

[upthesaints]

Re: mmvca

Time to start concentrating on the job at hand,good to get everyone thinking about our boys,all comments are a little tongue in cheek and interesting to see the reaction from certain areas,makes for good reading leading up to the finals this weekend.

We can wheel Nev out let him bat and then wheel him back if that's okay by all.(check that rule please)

Certainly would be good value even then,i am sure !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

In regards to the comment of stacking the 1's,whoever is in the side is an integral part of what the club is about and i am sure will produce when their turn comes around.

Rumour is that a certain old bloke(not to be named)could be an integral player in the lower grades(was a gun,just ask him) definately an old bull.

NAME EM!!! If I was playing in the Comp say 15 years ago would I remember him as being a fiery fast bowler that tried to kill people?

 

[wetdeck]

Re: mmvca

The rule for runners and substitute fielders are as follows

1. Substitutes and runners
(a) If the umpires are satisfied that a player has been injured or become ill after the nomination of the players, they shall allow that player to have
(i) a substitute acting instead of him in the field.
(ii) a runner when batting.
Any injury or illness that occurs at any time after the nomination of the players until the conclusion of the match shall be allowable, irrespective of whether play is in progress or not.


So by the sounds of that St Andrews nor any other club would not be able to use a sub fielder if it is known that a player has taken in a injury into the game. However at this level its a pretty hard thing to enforce.... How does the umpires on the day know that a player has taken an injury into the game? Unless of course say for example Nevelle Taylor didn't field the week before and Umpire A was umpiring when Nevelle didn't field due to an injury sustained in that game and Umpire A is also umpiring the following week when the same occures. I dont think the Umpires can take here say on these matters, even then its still going to be pretty hard to prove that he wasn't 100% fit going into the game? I think the runner thing will be hard to get for Saint Andrews but not allowing a fielder will be a little more diffiult even though they are undfer the same rule.

By the way the rule stated above also moves on to say....

(b) The umpires shall have discretion, for other wholly acceptable reasons, to allow a substitute for a fielder, or a runner for a batsman, at the start of the match or at any subsequent time.

So reading into that if the umpires let him have a fielder field for him they probably couldn't say no to a runner as its the same rule.

Anyway.... In my opinion Nifty will play. He loves the club to much and playing cricket to much to not play. He is not the youngest player in the club and there wont be to many more chances for him to play in Grand Finals so he will give it everything he has got. Plus I think the club will want and need him to play because the depth in batting in there 2's is not that great. The possible players who would replace him are Ryan Doidge (even Ryano would admit he has had a shocker of a year!), Micky Hamilton (averages 9 with the bat for the club) or most likely the in form 2's batsmen Georgey Salenro (around 350 runs for the season at about 40).

Even though I'm obviously a little biased I think if St Andrews fire they will be the team to beat without doubt.

nev is definitely playing... that is a fact.

it will be interesting to see wether he can bat well with a serious injury though... apparently he is in a fair bit of pain

 

[Dr Ben Dover]

Re: mmvca

Just a quick ranking on the final 4 My Picks: (1 being best)

Batting:

St.Marys - 2
Socials - 4
St Andrews - 1
East Coburg - 3

Bowling:

St.Marys - 1
Socials - 2
St Andrews - 3
East Coburg - 4

Be interested to get other views

 

[F.O.S]

Re: mmvca

nev is definitely playing... that is a fact.

it will be interesting to see wether he can bat well with a serious injury though... apparently he is in a fair bit of pain

Time to start concentrating on the job at hand,good to get everyone thinking about our boys,all comments are a little tongue in cheek and interesting to see the reaction from certain areas,makes for good reading leading up to the finals this weekend.

We can wheel Nev out let him bat and then wheel him back if that's okay by all.(check that rule please)

Certainly would be good value even then,i am sure !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

In regards to the comment of stacking the 1's,whoever is in the side is an integral part of what the club is about and i am sure will produce when their turn comes around.

Rumour is that a certain old bloke(not to be named)could be an integral player in the lower grades(was a gun,just ask him) definately an old bull.

 

[upthesaints]

Re: mmvca

Just a quick ranking on the final 4 My Picks: (1 being best)

Batting:

St.Marys - 2
Socials - 4
St Andrews - 1
East Coburg - 3

Bowling:

St.Marys - 1
Socials - 2
St Andrews - 3
East Coburg - 4

Be interested to get other views

Looking at potential I would have to agree with you there - your right on the money. However, I reckon looking purely on the season 07/08 St Mary's would have to be up there at least at 1 they have scored 300-400 more runs than most other teams in the 4. Statistiacally going of this season St Mary are without doubt the team to beat - be interesting to see if they can keep that going in post season.

 

[upthesaints]

Re: mmvca

Time to start concentrating on the job at hand,good to get everyone thinking about our boys,all comments are a little tongue in cheek and interesting to see the reaction from certain areas,makes for good reading leading up to the finals this weekend.

We can wheel Nev out let him bat and then wheel him back if that's okay by all.(check that rule please)

Certainly would be good value even then,i am sure !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

In regards to the comment of stacking the 1's,whoever is in the side is an integral part of what the club is about and i am sure will produce when their turn comes around.

Rumour is that a certain old bloke(not to be named)could be an integral player in the lower grades(was a gun,just ask him) definately an old bull.

NAME EM!!! If I was playing in the Comp say 15 years ago would I remember him as being a fiery fast bowler that tried to kill people?

 

[F.O.S]

Re: mmvca

Just a quick ranking on the final 4 My Picks: (1 being best)

Batting:

St.Marys - 2
Socials - 4
St Andrews - 1
East Coburg - 3

Bowling:

St.Marys - 1
Socials - 2
St Andrews - 3
East Coburg - 4

Be interested to get other views[/Q

Overall view

St Marys

Batting Been consistant since ST Andrews game and capable of big score
Bowling Have both Pace and spin covered,good overall attack

Socials

Batting Capable of good score,but need to get some partnerships going
Bowling Solid attack,capable of doing the job

East Coburg

Batting Showed capable of chasing and making huge scores
Bowling Good attack,but need support for bowlers in the field

St Andrews

Batting Team batting is what they about and capable of anything if allowed
Bowling Very good attack,capable of taking wickets and containment

St Marys definately flag favorites on form
Socials Big test this week,then who knows
East Coburg Could be anything on current form
St Andrews Finals experience and capable of producing big scores

 

[Dr Ben Dover]

Re: mmvca

Just a quick ranking on the final 4 My Picks: (1 being best)

Batting:

St.Marys - 2
Socials - 4
St Andrews - 1
East Coburg - 3

Bowling:

St.Marys - 1
Socials - 2
St Andrews - 3
East Coburg - 4

Be interested to get other views

 

[mmvca]

Re: mmvca

Good luck to everyone this weekend guys.

Especially to my old Coburg Amateurs mates, the Tapners, Wernhams and the Newtons. Hopefully we see you guys in a week and a bit.@|

 

[upthesaints]

Re: mmvca

Just a quick ranking on the final 4 My Picks: (1 being best)

Batting:

St.Marys - 2
Socials - 4
St Andrews - 1
East Coburg - 3

Bowling:

St.Marys - 1
Socials - 2
St Andrews - 3
East Coburg - 4

Be interested to get other views

Looking at potential I would have to agree with you there - your right on the money. However, I reckon looking purely on the season 07/08 St Mary's would have to be up there at least at 1 they have scored 300-400 more runs than most other teams in the 4. Statistiacally going of this season St Mary are without doubt the team to beat - be interesting to see if they can keep that going in post season.

 

[Champ is here]

Re: mmvca

there seems to be alot of st andrews blokes trying pump there tyres up a bit on this forum of late. maybe a facade i think because they know they are a long way behind where they were this trime last year

 

[F.O.S]

Re: mmvca

Just a quick ranking on the final 4 My Picks: (1 being best)

Batting:

St.Marys - 2
Socials - 4
St Andrews - 1
East Coburg - 3

Bowling:

St.Marys - 1
Socials - 2
St Andrews - 3
East Coburg - 4

Be interested to get other views[/Q

Overall view

St Marys

Batting Been consistant since ST Andrews game and capable of big score
Bowling Have both Pace and spin covered,good overall attack

Socials

Batting Capable of good score,but need to get some partnerships going
Bowling Solid attack,capable of doing the job

East Coburg

Batting Showed capable of chasing and making huge scores
Bowling Good attack,but need support for bowlers in the field

St Andrews

Batting Team batting is what they about and capable of anything if allowed
Bowling Very good attack,capable of taking wickets and containment

St Marys definately flag favorites on form
Socials Big test this week,then who knows
East Coburg Could be anything on current form
St Andrews Finals experience and capable of producing big scores

 

[first slipper]

Re: mmvca

nev is definitely playing... that is a fact.

it will be interesting to see wether he can bat well with a serious injury though... apparently he is in a fair bit of pain

I think the comp has to take their hats off to all the clubs competing in A Turf this season.The way the season has panned out, with 7 sides within 6 points of second spot and fighting to make the four after round 7. It has been a great finsh to the home and away season, capped off with the East Coburg & St Andrews thriller and the upset of Haig smashing Sunshine .

As for the finals, it is good to see that all 4 sides are so evenly matched and to pick a winner, is far to hard to do out of the 4 sides! So i will sit on the fence for another week and then have a go at a 50% chance.

Good luck to all the clubs still involved in the finals
and to my team's selection commitee - I am fit and ready!!

 

[mmvca]

Re: mmvca

Good luck to everyone this weekend guys.

Especially to my old Coburg Amateurs mates, the Tapners, Wernhams and the Newtons. Hopefully we see you guys in a week and a bit.@|

 

[superspin]

Re: mmvca

I think the comp has to take their hats off to all the clubs competing in A Turf this season.The way the season has panned out, with 7 sides within 6 points of second spot and fighting to make the four after round 7. It has been a great finsh to the home and away season, capped off with the East Coburg & St Andrews thriller and the upset of Haig smashing Sunshine .

As for the finals, it is good to see that all 4 sides are so evenly matched and to pick a winner, is far to hard to do out of the 4 sides! So i will sit on the fence for another week and then have a go at a 50% chance.

Good luck to all the clubs still involved in the finals
and to my team's selection commitee - I am fit and ready!!

you might think your ready, but fit, nah!!!

 

[Champ is here]

Re: mmvca

there seems to be alot of st andrews blokes trying pump there tyres up a bit on this forum of late. maybe a facade i think because they know they are a long way behind where they were this trime last year

 

[upthesaints]

Re: mmvca

ok, something a little different - who are the best two umpires for season 07/08 that will be officiating in this years A Grade Grand Final?

 

[first slipper]

Re: mmvca

nev is definitely playing... that is a fact.

it will be interesting to see wether he can bat well with a serious injury though... apparently he is in a fair bit of pain

I think the comp has to take their hats off to all the clubs competing in A Turf this season.The way the season has panned out, with 7 sides within 6 points of second spot and fighting to make the four after round 7. It has been a great finsh to the home and away season, capped off with the East Coburg & St Andrews thriller and the upset of Haig smashing Sunshine .

As for the finals, it is good to see that all 4 sides are so evenly matched and to pick a winner, is far to hard to do out of the 4 sides! So i will sit on the fence for another week and then have a go at a 50% chance.

Good luck to all the clubs still involved in the finals
and to my team's selection commitee - I am fit and ready!!

 

[F.O.S]

Re: mmvca

Good luck to everyone this weekend guys.

Especially to my old Coburg Amateurs mates, the Tapners, Wernhams and the Newtons. Hopefully we see you guys in a week and a bit.@|

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

Harry
Darren
Gavin
Plugger
Scotty
Justin
Paul
Jason Moore
Ash Saad
Jamie (out of retirement)
F.O.S (fine leg to fine leg)

Not a bad Coburg Amateur side (might have missed a few)

 

[superspin]

Re: mmvca

I think the comp has to take their hats off to all the clubs competing in A Turf this season.The way the season has panned out, with 7 sides within 6 points of second spot and fighting to make the four after round 7. It has been a great finsh to the home and away season, capped off with the East Coburg & St Andrews thriller and the upset of Haig smashing Sunshine .

As for the finals, it is good to see that all 4 sides are so evenly matched and to pick a winner, is far to hard to do out of the 4 sides! So i will sit on the fence for another week and then have a go at a 50% chance.

Good luck to all the clubs still involved in the finals
and to my team's selection commitee - I am fit and ready!!

you might think your ready, but fit, nah!!!

 

[F.O.S]

Re: mmvca

there seems to be alot of st andrews blokes trying pump there tyres up a bit on this forum of late. maybe a facade i think because they know they are a long way behind where they were this trime last year

Love this time of the year,been a bit boring previously !!!!!!

Trying,what a good word to break down.

Everyone trying
Very trying
Team trying
Trying to win
Trying to make 263 and 288 in last two real games.

Trying to love my cricket !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[upthesaints]

Re: mmvca

ok, something a little different - who are the best two umpires for season 07/08 that will be officiating in this years A Grade Grand Final?

 

[first slipper]

Re: mmvca

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

Harry
Darren
Gavin
Plugger
Scotty
Justin
Paul
Jason Moore
Ash Saad
Jamie (out of retirement)
F.O.S (fine leg to fine leg)

Not a bad Coburg Amateur side (might have missed a few)

Sound like a good side but you would have to take Harry out done nothing for the last couple of years

 

[F.O.S]

Re: mmvca

Good luck to everyone this weekend guys.

Especially to my old Coburg Amateurs mates, the Tapners, Wernhams and the Newtons. Hopefully we see you guys in a week and a bit.@|

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

Harry
Darren
Gavin
Plugger
Scotty
Justin
Paul
Jason Moore
Ash Saad
Jamie (out of retirement)
F.O.S (fine leg to fine leg)

Not a bad Coburg Amateur side (might have missed a few)

 

[Hirdy05_]

Re: mmvca

ok, something a little different - who are the best two umpires for season 07/08 that will be officiating in this years A Grade Grand Final?

Pollard and Alfy

Al Taylor has his moments, but wouldn't count him out, 1 of the best on his day.

All the rest are very average.

 

[F.O.S]

Re: mmvca

there seems to be alot of st andrews blokes trying pump there tyres up a bit on this forum of late. maybe a facade i think because they know they are a long way behind where they were this trime last year

Love this time of the year,been a bit boring previously !!!!!!

Trying,what a good word to break down.

Everyone trying
Very trying
Team trying
Trying to win
Trying to make 263 and 288 in last two real games.

Trying to love my cricket !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Old School]

Re: mmvca

ok, something a little different - who are the best two umpires for season 07/08 that will be officiating in this years A Grade Grand Final?

Pat Campbell & Gary Houston
Just ahead of Alf, Steve Pollard & Alan Taylor

 

[first slipper]

Re: mmvca

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

Harry
Darren
Gavin
Plugger
Scotty
Justin
Paul
Jason Moore
Ash Saad
Jamie (out of retirement)
F.O.S (fine leg to fine leg)

Not a bad Coburg Amateur side (might have missed a few)

Sound like a good side but you would have to take Harry out done nothing for the last couple of years

 

[Old School]

Re: mmvca

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

Harry
Darren
Gavin
Plugger
Scotty
Justin
Paul
Jason Moore
Ash Saad
Jamie (out of retirement)
F.O.S (fine leg to fine leg)

Not a bad Coburg Amateur side (might have missed a few)

Take out Harry & Jason Moore, add Jolley & Harvey and you have the St. Andrews 1st eleven.

 

[Hirdy05_]

Re: mmvca

ok, something a little different - who are the best two umpires for season 07/08 that will be officiating in this years A Grade Grand Final?

Pollard and Alfy

Al Taylor has his moments, but wouldn't count him out, 1 of the best on his day.

All the rest are very average.

 

[King of Swing]

Re: mmvca

Pat Campbell & Gary Houston
Just ahead of Alf, Steve Pollard & Alan Taylor

I would probably have to agree there, what are your thoughts Essendon 2000?