Re: Wrist Spin Bowling
Rashid improved a bit as the match went on. he finished up with 10-0-56-1. got the wicket but was the most expensive bowler in the side. the wicket was a big top edge that looped up and got caught by the keeper. he had a couple of others that were almost wickets, a "dropped" catch (it was a full stretch dive that brushed the fielders fingertips) and a few edges that dropped to no-one.
they showed quite a few slow motions of Rashids bowling today which was good to see. he generates big revolutions on the ball but his wrist position is horrible. he doesnt impart the spin sideways, its like a gyroscopic effect. so the seam is always completely scrambled, sometimes it turns sometimes it doesnt. if he landed it on the seam he would be formiddable!!
maybe its a deliberate thing in one day cricket, the revs still produce lots of movement in flight, but off the pitch the variations seem to be more in bounce than turn. i guess that limits wide balls and easy hits. id like to see him bowl in a test match to see if he bowls "properly" then. his talent looks completely wasted when the seam is presented how it is. Shane Warne could turn the ball as big as anyone, and you rarely saw him altering his game massively for one day cricket, im not sure i really agree with the thinking behind it. i think if youre a leg spinner you should be looking to spin the ball, and as a consequence turn it as big as possible. so far hes got 1 wicket in 2 matches, if he was turning the ball i reckon he'd have a fair few more, because his basic technique and talent all look to be there.
Jim2109;364689 said:Adil Rashid got the nod for England today in their ODI against Australia. England batted first and Rashid wasnt great, only 4 runs, but Brett Lee took 4 awesome wickets with mid-90mph yorkers, including Rashid!
hes come on to bowl at 2nd change, England struggling already, and in 2 overs hes gone for 10 and 9, 19 total. he bowled one delivery so wide down the leg side that it barely even bounced on the wicket, and somehow Ponting still hit it for a 4 at fine leg lol. theres been a couple called wide, and a couple that would have been had there not been bat on them.
hes just bowling his 3rd over now, with so few runs on the board for England im not sure how hes supposed to bowl with any kind of aggression though. the batsmen can just tickle him around and capitalise on anything loose. this match wont do anything towards staking his claim in the test side though.
Rashid improved a bit as the match went on. he finished up with 10-0-56-1. got the wicket but was the most expensive bowler in the side. the wicket was a big top edge that looped up and got caught by the keeper. he had a couple of others that were almost wickets, a "dropped" catch (it was a full stretch dive that brushed the fielders fingertips) and a few edges that dropped to no-one.
they showed quite a few slow motions of Rashids bowling today which was good to see. he generates big revolutions on the ball but his wrist position is horrible. he doesnt impart the spin sideways, its like a gyroscopic effect. so the seam is always completely scrambled, sometimes it turns sometimes it doesnt. if he landed it on the seam he would be formiddable!!
maybe its a deliberate thing in one day cricket, the revs still produce lots of movement in flight, but off the pitch the variations seem to be more in bounce than turn. i guess that limits wide balls and easy hits. id like to see him bowl in a test match to see if he bowls "properly" then. his talent looks completely wasted when the seam is presented how it is. Shane Warne could turn the ball as big as anyone, and you rarely saw him altering his game massively for one day cricket, im not sure i really agree with the thinking behind it. i think if youre a leg spinner you should be looking to spin the ball, and as a consequence turn it as big as possible. so far hes got 1 wicket in 2 matches, if he was turning the ball i reckon he'd have a fair few more, because his basic technique and talent all look to be there.